Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652927›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2025

Surgical Techniques in Nontraumatic Midcarpal Instability: Evaluating the Dorsal Capsulodesis and 3-Ligament Tenodesis Technique.

Stefanie N Hakkesteegt, Isabel C Jongen, Caroline A Hundepool, Mark J W van der Oest, Liron S Duraku, Reinier Feitz, J Michiel Zuidam, Hand-Wrist Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefanie N HakkesteegtFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center.
Isabel C JongenFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center.
Caroline A HundepoolFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center.
Mark J W van der OestFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center.
Liron S DurakuDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center.
Reinier FeitzFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center.
J Michiel ZuidamFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center.
Hand-Wrist Study Group
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical management of midcarpal instability (MCI), also referred to as carpal instability nondissociative, remains controversial because of limited evidence on different techniques. This study aimed to assess and compare differences in patient-reported pain, hand and wrist function, satisfaction, range of motion, and return to work in patients with nontraumatic MCI who underwent surgical treatment either through dorsal wrist capsulodesis or 3-ligament tenodesis (3LT).

methodsPatients with MCI and persisting complaints after conservative therapy treated with 3LT or dorsal capsulodesis were included. Patients with posttraumatic instability were excluded. Primary endpoints included the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation and Satisfaction with Treatment Result Questionnaire at 12 months postoperatively. All data were analyzed retrospectively.

resultsA total of 91 patients treated with dorsal capsulodesis and 21 treated with 3LT between December of 2011 and December of 2019 were included. At 12 months postoperatively, both treatment groups reported significant improvements in pain and function scores. However, at 3 months postoperatively, the dorsal capsulodesis group exhibited significantly better outcomes, followed by a greater return-to-work rate (72%) compared with the 3LT group (50%). However, the capsulodesis group demonstrated a decreased range of motion at 3 months that was restored at 12 months postoperatively. No significant difference in satisfaction with treatment was observed.

conclusionsBoth 3LT and dorsal capsulodesis demonstrate promising results for addressing nontraumatic MCI. However, considering the quicker recovery and faster return to work associated with dorsal capsulodesis, the authors recommend favoring capsulodesis over 3LT when both surgical options are deemed suitable for the patient.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityRange of Motion, ArticularTenodesisAdultFemaleHumansJoint CapsuleLigaments, ArticularMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesReturn to WorkTreatment OutcomeWrist JointYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38652927
PMCPMC11651348
OpenAlexW4395051586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.