Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652872›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Salvage Reirradiation for Locally Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Results From a Prospective Study With 7.2 Years of Follow-Up.

Christian Ekanger, Svein Inge Helle, Lars Reisæter, Liv Bolstad Hysing, Rune Kvåle, Alfred Honoré, Karsten Gravdal, Sara Pilskog, Olav Dahl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian EkangerDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6526-7174
Svein Inge HelleDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Lars ReisæterDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Liv Bolstad HysingDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-7549
Rune KvåleDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-230X
Alfred HonoréDepartment of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0420-2585
Karsten GravdalDepartment of Patohology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0009-0004-5914-0515
Sara PilskogDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Olav DahlDepartment of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are no well-established re-treatment options for local recurrence after primary curative radiation therapy for prostate cancer (PCa), as prospective studies with long-term follow-up are lacking. Here, we present results from a prospective study on focal salvage reirradiation with external-beam radiation therapy with a median follow-up of 7.2 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 2013 to 2017, 38 patients with biopsy-proven locally recurrent PCa >2 years after previous treatment and absence of grade 2-3 toxicity from the first course of radiation were included. The treatment was 35 Gy in five fractions to the MRI-based target volume and 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy starting 3 months before radiation. The Phoenix criteria defined biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), and toxicity was scored according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria.

resultsMedian age was 70 years, and median time from primary radiation to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence was 83 months. The actuarial 2-year and 5-year bRFS were 81% (95% CI, 69 to 94) and 58% (95% CI, 49 to 74), respectively. The actuarial 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 93% (95% CI, 82 to 100), metastasis-free survival was 82% (95% CI, 69 to 95), and overall survival was 87% (95% CI, 76 to 98). Two patients (5%) had durable grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, one combined with GI grade 3 toxicity. A PSA doubling time ≤6 months at salvage, a Gleason score >7, and a PSA nadir ≥0.1 ng/mL predicted a worse outcome.

conclusionReirradiation with EBRT for locally recurrent PCa after primary curative radiation therapy is clinically feasible and demonstrated a favorable outcome with acceptable toxicity in this prospective study with long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatic NeoplasmsRe-IrradiationSalvage TherapyAgedAged, 80 and overFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38652872
PMCPMC11191049
OpenAlexW4395027808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.