Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652504›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2024

Recommendations for pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice guidelines in the US.

Daniel L Hertz, Chad A Bousman, Howard L McLeod, Andrew A Monte, Deepak Voora, Lori A Orlando, Rustin D Crutchley, Benjamin Brown, Wrenda Teeple, Sara Rogers and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Toward an integrated resource for pharmacogenomics (PGx): Survey findings from the genomic medicine communities.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel L HertzDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Chad A BousmanDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Howard L McLeodCenter for Precision Medicine and Functional Genomics, Utah Tech University, St. George, UT, USA.
Andrew A MonteSection of Pharmacology & Medical Toxicology, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Deepak VooraDuke Precision Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Lori A OrlandoDepartment of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Rustin D CrutchleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Manchester University, Fort Wayne, IN, USA.
Benjamin BrownAmerican Society of Pharmacovigilance, Houston, TX, USA.
Wrenda TeepleArbit Consulting, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sara RogersAmerican Society of Pharmacovigilance, Houston, TX, and Texas A&M Health Science Center, Bryan, TX, USA.
Jai N PatelDepartment of Cancer Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

Personalizing EmerGency/Acute therapeuticS Utilizing Systems biology (PEGASUS-2)R35GM152157 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Andrew Albert Monte · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePharmacogenetic testing can identify patients who may benefit from personalized drug treatment. However, clinical uptake of pharmacogenetic testing has been limited. Clinical practice guidelines recommend biomarker tests that the guideline authors deem to have demonstrated clinical utility, meaning that testing improves treatment outcomes. The objective of this narrative review is to describe the current status of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations within clinical practice guidelines in the US. SUMMARY: Guidelines were reviewed for pharmacogenetic testing recommendations for 21 gene-drug pairs that have well-established drug response associations and all of which are categorized as clinically actionable by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium. The degree of consistency within and between organizations in pharmacogenetic testing recommendations was assessed. Relatively few clinical practice guidelines that provide a pharmacogenetic testing recommendation were identified. Testing recommendations for HLA-B*57:01 before initiation of abacavir and G6PD before initiation of rasburicase, both of which are included in drug labeling, were mostly consistent across guidelines. Gene-drug pairs with at least one clinical practice guideline recommending testing or stating that testing could be considered included CYP2C19-clopidogrel, CYP2D6-codeine, CYP2D6-tramadol, CYP2B6-efavirenz, TPMT-thiopurines, and NUDT15-thiopurines. Testing recommendations for the same gene-drug pair were often inconsistent between organizations and sometimes inconsistent between different guidelines from the same organization.

conclusionA standardized approach to evaluating the evidence of clinical utility for pharmacogenetic testing may increase the inclusion and consistency of pharmacogenetic testing recommendations in clinical practice guidelines, which could benefit patients and society by increasing clinical use of pharmacogenetic testing.

Indexed as

Pharmacogenomic TestingPractice Guidelines as TopicHumansPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineUnited Statesclinical practice guidelinesclinical utilitygenetic testingpharmacogenetic testingpharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID38652504
PMCPMC12097901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.