Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652478›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2024

Cognitive Training for Reduction of Delirium in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yu Jiang, Yanhu Xie, Panpan Fang, Zixiang Shang, Lihai Chen, Jifang Zhou, Chao Yang, Wenjie Zhu, Xixi Hao, Jianming Ding and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Targeting neuroinflammation and PVNMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yanhu XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Panpan FangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zixiang ShangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Lihai ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jifang ZhouSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Chao YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Wenjie ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xixi HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Jianming DingDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Panpan YinDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Zan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Mengyuan CaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Qilian TanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Dan ChengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Siyu KongSchool of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xianfu LuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Xuesheng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical, University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Daniel I SesslerOutcomes Research Consortium, Department of Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
CT-LIFE Study Collaborators
Anhui Medical University · CNNanjing Medical University · CNChina Pharmaceutical University · CNUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CNCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePostoperative delirium is a common and impactful neuropsychiatric complication in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Cognitive training may enhance cognitive reserve, thereby reducing postoperative delirium.

objectiveTo determine whether preoperative cognitive training reduces the incidence of delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN, SETTING, and

participantsThis prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 university teaching hospitals in southeastern China with enrollment between April 2022 and May 2023. Eligible participants included those scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting who consented and enrolled at least 10 days before surgery.

interventionsParticipating patients were randomly assigned 1:1, stratified by site, to either routine care or cognitive training, which included substantial practice with online tasks designed to enhance cognitive functions including memory, imagination, reasoning, reaction time, attention, and processing speed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was occurrence of delirium during postoperative days 1 to 7 or until hospital discharge, diagnosed using the Confusion Assessment Method or the Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Units. Secondary outcomes were postoperative cognitive dysfunction, delirium characteristics, and all-cause mortality within 30 days following the operation.

resultsA total of 218 patients were randomized and 208 (median [IQR] age, 66 [58-70] years; 64 female [30.8%] and 144 male [69.2%]) were included in final analysis, with 102 randomized to cognitive training and 106 randomized to routine care. Of all participants, 95 (45.7%) had only a primary school education and 54 (26.0%) had finished high school. In the cognitive training group, 28 participants (27.5%) developed delirium compared with 46 participants (43.4%) randomized to routine care. Those receiving cognitive training were 57% less likely to develop delirium compared with those receiving routine care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; P = .007). Significant differences were observed in the incidence of severe delirium (aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.25-0.82; P = .01), median (IQR) duration of delirium (0 [0-1] days for cognitive training vs 0 [0-2] days for routine care; P = .008), and median (IQR) number of delirium-positive days (0 [0-1] days for cognitive training vs 0 [0-2] days for routine care; P = .007). No other secondary outcomes differed significantly. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized trial of 208 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, preoperative cognitive training reduced the incidence of postoperative delirium. However, our primary analysis was based on fewer than 75 events and should therefore be considered exploratory and a basis for future larger trials. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2200058243.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassDeliriumPostoperative ComplicationsAgedChinaCognitive Behavioral TherapyCognitive TrainingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSingle-Blind Method

Identifiers

PMID38652478
PMCPMC11040409
OpenAlexW4395033980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.