Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652475›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

CDH1 Genotype Exploration in Women With Hereditary Lobular Breast Cancer Phenotype.

Giovanni Corso, Elena Marino, Cristina Zanzottera, Carla Oliveira, Loris Bernard, Debora Macis, Joana Figueiredo, Joana Pereira, Patrícia Carneiro, Giulia Massari and 16 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Cancer Diagnoses in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Increased Childhood Cancer Occurrence.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni CorsoDivision of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Elena MarinoClinic Unit of Oncogenomics, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Cristina ZanzotteraDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carla OliveiraInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Loris BernardClinic Unit of Oncogenomics, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Debora MacisDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Joana FigueiredoInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Joana PereiraInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Patrícia CarneiroInstituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Giulia MassariDivision of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Massimo BarberisDivision of Pathology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Alessandra Margherita De ScalziDivision of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Sergio Vincenzo TaorminaDivision of Pathology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Elham SajjadiDivision of Pathology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Claudia SangalliData Management, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Sara GandiniDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Oriana D'EcclesiisDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Cristina Maria TrovatoDivision of Endoscopy, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Anna RotiliDivision of Breast Imaging, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Filippo PesapaneDivision of Breast Imaging, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Luca NicosiaDivision of Breast Imaging, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Carlo La VecchiaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Branch of Medical Statistics, Biometry and Epidemiology "G.A. Maccacaro," University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Viviana GalimbertiDivision of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Elena Guerini-RoccoDivision of Pathology, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Bernardo BonanniDivision of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Paolo VeronesiDivision of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITi3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Milan · ITData Management (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline CDH1 variants are associated with risk for diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer (LBC) in the so-called hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome. However, in some circumstances, LBC can be the first manifestation of this syndrome in the absence of diffuse gastric cancer manifestation. Objectives: To evaluate the frequency of germline CDH1 variants in women with the hereditary LBC (HLBC) phenotype, somatic CDH1 gene inactivation in germline CDH1 variant carriers' tumor samples, and the association of genetic profiles with clinical-pathological data and survival. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, longitudinal, prospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2021, with follow-up until January 31, 2023. Women with LBC seen at the European Institute of Oncology were included. Testing for germline CDH1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 genes was performed. Somatic profiling was assessed for germline CDH1 carriers. Main Outcomes and Measures: Accurate estimates of prevalence of germline CDH1 variants among patients with HLBC and the association of somatic sequence alteration with HLBC syndrome. The Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied for overall and disease-free survival analysis. Results: Of 5429 cases of primary LBC, familial LBC phenotype accounted for 1867 (34.4%). A total of 394 women with LBC were tested, among whom 15 germline CDH1 variants in 15 unrelated families were identified. Among these variants, 6 (40.0%) were P/LP, with an overall frequency of 1.5% (6 of 394). Of the 6 probands with P/LP CDH1 LBC, 5 (83.3%) had a positive family history of BC and only 1 (16.7%) had sporadic juvenile early-onset LBC. No germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were identified in CDH1 carriers. An inactivating CDH1 mechanism (second hit) was identified in 4 of 6 explored matched tumor samples (66.7%) in P/LP germline carriers. The P/LP CDH1 LBC variant carriers had a significantly lower age at diagnosis compared with the group carrying CDH1 variants of unknown significance or likely benign (42.5 [IQR, 38.3-43.0] vs 51.0 [IQR, 45.0-53.0] years; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, P/LP germline CDH1 variants were identified in individuals not fulfilling the classic clinical criteria for HDGC screening, suggesting that identification of these variants may provide a novel method to test women with LBC with early age at diagnosis and/or positive family history of BC.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsGerm-Line MutationPhenotypeAdultAgedCarcinoma, LobularFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAntigens, CDCadherinsCDH1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID38652475
PMCPMC11040411
OpenAlexW4395033843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.