ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024
Antibody Drug Conjugates in Urological Cancers: A Review of the Current Landscape.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- PET Imaging of Accessible Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Reveals Dose-Dependent and Tumor Burden-Driven Variability.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Enfortumab Vedotin After Platinum Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Real-World Analysis of the ARON-2EV Cohort.European urology open science · 2025Article
- Real-world evaluation of the efficacy and safety of disitamab vedotin (RC48) in urothelial carcinoma.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Perioperative Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- Global variations in oncology professionals' confidence levels for managing antibody-drug conjugate toxicities: a cross-continental survey.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Reversing Epigenetic Dysregulation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Considerations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Application of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: Status and Challenge.OncoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
- Combined DNA-PK and PARP Inhibition as a Therapeutic Strategy in BRCA-Mutated Prostate Cancer: An in Vitro Pilot Study.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewOur review delves into the progress across urological malignancies and discusses ongoing challenges and future directions in antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) development, emphasising their transformative potential in cancer care. RECENT
findingsADCs have advanced from hematologic to solid tumours, notably in breast cancer, and are now pivotal in metastatic urological cancers as both monotherapies and in combination regimens, underscored by the FDA's approval of enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan for metastatic urothelial cancer. Progress in metastatic prostate cancer, particularly with ADCs targeting PSMA and STEAP1, is noteworthy, although renal cell cancer presents ongoing challenges. There is a continual search for agents in the metastatic, relapsed testicular cancer landscape. ADCs have emerged as a pivotal innovation in oncology, blending targeted antibody therapy with potent cytotoxic drugs, significantly advancing treatment options for urological malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.