Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652408›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2024

A Prospective, Longitudinal Comparison of Sexual Distress Across Relationship Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kayla M Mooney, Maeve Mulroy, Julianna Park, Caroline F Pukall

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayla M MooneyDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch Street, Humphrey Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Maeve MulroyDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch Street, Humphrey Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Julianna ParkDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch Street, Humphrey Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Caroline F PukallDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, 62 Arch Street, Humphrey Hall, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. caroline.pukall@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1553-6118
Queen's University · CA

Funding

Queen's University CRC-2020-00061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have described declines in sexual well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic, although experiences of sexual distress during this time appear to be mixed. Previous research has relied on cross-sectional methodology and focused on individuals in relationships. Furthermore, little is known about the frequency of "COVID-safe" sexual behaviors, such as online sexual activities. These gaps in the literature were addressed using a prospective, longitudinal online study examining sexual distress, predictors of sexual distress (i.e., perceived stress), and online sexual activities over time in single and partnered individuals. Participants were single (N = 64) and partnered (N = 60) individuals who completed surveys at three timepoints over a 6-month period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mean age across the two groups was 29 years, and approximately half were women (51.6% and 50%, respectively). Results indicated that single individuals reported significantly higher sexual distress than partnered individuals at Times 1 and 2, but not at Time 3. Sexual distress significantly decreased over time for individuals in the single group but remained stable for partnered individuals. At each timepoint, there was a conditional effect of perceived stress on sexual distress depending on one's relationship status, and the nature of these conditional effects changed throughout the course of the study. Results suggested that single individuals demonstrated improvements in sexual distress over time. Perceived stress is an important predictor of sexual distress but may operate differently depending on relationship status. Results highlight the resiliency of both single and partnered individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sexual BehaviorSexual PartnersStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesPsychological DistressSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19Online sexual behavioursPerceived stressSexual distressSexual health

Identifiers

PMID38652408
OpenAlexW4395033394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.