ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024
A mechanistic simulation of induced DNA damage in a bacterial cell by X- and gamma rays: a parameter study.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of relative biological effectiveness for protons, carbon and oxygen ion beams by DNA damage calculations in a fractal fibroblast cell geometry.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanistic Monte Carlo simulations calculating DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation are highly dependent on the simulation parameters. In the present study, using the Geant4-DNA toolkit, the impact of different parameters on DNA damage induced in a bacterial cell by X- and gamma-ray irradiation was investigated. Three geometry configurations, including the simple (without DNA details), the random (a random multiplication of identical DNA segments), and the fractal (a regular replication of DNA segments using fractal Hilbert curves), were simulated. Also, three physics constructors implemented in Geant4-DNA, i.e., G4EmDNAPhysics_option2, G4EmDNAPhysics_option4, and G4EmDNAPhysics_option6, with two energy thresholds of 17.5 eV and 5-37.5 eV were compared for direct DNA damage calculations. Finally, a previously developed mathematical model of cell repair called MEDRAS (Mechanistic DNA Repair and Survival) was employed to compare the impact of physics constructors on the cell survival curve. The simple geometry leads to undesirable results compared to the random and fractal ones, highlighting the importance of simulating complex DNA structures in mechanistic simulation studies. Under the same conditions, the DNA damage calculated in the fractal geometry was more consistent with the experimental data. All physics constructors can be used alternatively with the fractal geometry, provided that an energy threshold of 17.5 eV is considered for recording direct DNA damage. All physics constructors represent a similar behavior in generating cell survival curves, although the slopes of the curves are different. Since the inverse of the slope of a bacterial cell survival curve (i.e., the D
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.