Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38652320›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2024

Intensive care unit follow-up clinic activities: a scoping review.

Junji Hatakeyama, Kensuke Nakamura, Hidenori Sumita, Daisuke Kawakami, Nobuto Nakanishi, Shizuka Kashiwagi, Keibun Liu, Yutaka Kondo

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Junji HatakeyamaDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-Machi, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan.
Kensuke NakamuraDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan. knakamura-tky@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-0294
Hidenori SumitaClinic Sumita, 305-12, Minamiyamashinden, Ina-cho, Toyokawa, Aichi, 441-0105, Japan.
Daisuke KawakamiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Iizuka Hospital, 3-83, Yoshio-machi, Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-8505, Japan.
Nobuto NakanishiDivision of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki, Chuo-ward, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
Shizuka KashiwagiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Keibun LiuCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Road CHERMSIDE QLD 4032, Brisbane, Australia.
Yutaka KondoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, 2-1-1 Tomioka, Urayasu, Chiba, 279-0021, Japan.
Yokohama City University Hospital · JPAso Iizuka Hospital · JPJuntendo University Urayasu Hospital · JPKobe University · JPOsaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences · JPPrince Charles Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of ongoing post-discharge follow-up to prevent functional impairment in patients discharged from intensive care units (ICUs) is being increasingly recognized. Therefore, we conducted a scoping review, which included existing ICU follow-up clinic methodologies using the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases from their inception to December 2022. Data were examined for country or region, outpatient name, location, opening days, lead profession, eligible patients, timing of the follow-up, and assessment tools. Twelve studies were included in our review. The results obtained revealed that the methods employed by ICU follow-up clinics varied among countries and regions. The names of outpatient follow-up clinics also varied; however, all were located within the facility. These clinics were mainly physician or nurse led; however, pharmacists, physical therapists, neuropsychologists, and social workers were also involved. Some clinics were limited to critically ill patients with sepsis or those requiring ventilation. Ten studies reported the first outpatient visit 1-3 months after discharge. All studies assessed physical function, cognitive function, mental health, and the health-related quality of life. This scoping review revealed that an optimal operating format for ICU follow-up clinics needs to be established according to the categories of critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPatient DischargeAftercareCritical CareCritical IllnessFollow-Up StudiesHumansQuality of LifeCritical illnessFunctional impairmentPICS clinicPost-intensive care syndromeRecovery center

Identifiers

PMID38652320
OpenAlexW4395048582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.