Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38651625›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Comprehensive analysis of synthetic learning applied to neonatal brain MRI segmentation.

R Valabregue, F Girka, A Pron, F Rousseau, G Auzias

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R ValabregueCENIR, Institut du Cerveau (ICM)-Paris Brain Institute, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-9570
F GirkaCENIR, Institut du Cerveau (ICM)-Paris Brain Institute, Inserm U 1127, CNRS UMR 7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
A PronAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, Marseille, France.
F RousseauIMT Atlantique, LaTIM INSERM U1101, Brest, France.
G AuziasAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone, UMR 7289, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0414-5691

Funding

European Research Council 319456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain segmentation from neonatal MRI images is a very challenging task due to large changes in the shape of cerebral structures and variations in signal intensities reflecting the gestational process. In this context, there is a clear need for segmentation techniques that are robust to variations in image contrast and to the spatial configuration of anatomical structures. In this work, we evaluate the potential of synthetic learning, a contrast-independent model trained using synthetic images generated from the ground truth labels of very few subjects. We base our experiments on the dataset released by the developmental Human Connectome Project, for which high-quality images are available for more than 700 babies aged between 26 and 45 weeks postconception. First, we confirm the impressive performance of a standard UNet trained on a few volumes, but also confirm that such models learn intensity-related features specific to the training domain. We then confirm the robustness of the synthetic learning approach to variations in image contrast. However, we observe a clear influence of the age of the baby on the predictions. We improve the performance of this model by enriching the synthetic training set with realistic motion artifacts and over-segmentation of the white matter. Based on extensive visual assessment, we argue that the better performance of the model trained on real T2w data may be due to systematic errors in the ground truth. We propose an original experiment allowing us to show that learning from real data will reproduce any systematic bias affecting the training set, while synthetic models can avoid this limitation. Overall, our experiments confirm that synthetic learning is an effective solution for segmenting neonatal brain MRI. Our adapted synthetic learning approach combines key features that will be instrumental for large multisite studies and clinical applications.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedInfant, NewbornMachine LearningMaleNeuroimagingbraindeep learningdHCPMRInewbornsegmentationsynthetic

Identifiers

PMID38651625
PMCPMC11036377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.