Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38651443›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2024

An Insight into Knowledge, Perspective, and Practices of Indian Optometrists towards Childhood Myopia.

Archana Naik, Siddharth K Karthikeyan, Jivitha Jyothi Ramesh, Shwetha Bhaskar, Chinnappa A Ganapathi, Sayantan Biswas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Archana NaikDepartment of Optometry, Netra Jyothi Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Udupi 576101, Karnataka, India.
Siddharth K KarthikeyanDepartment of Optometry, Netra Jyothi Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Udupi 576101, Karnataka, India.
Jivitha Jyothi RameshDepartment of Optometry, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India.
Shwetha BhaskarDepartment of Optometry, Netra Jyothi Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Udupi 576101, Karnataka, India.
Chinnappa A GanapathiDepartment of Paediatric Ophthalmology, Prasad Netralaya, Udupi 576101, Karnataka, India.
Sayantan BiswasSchool of Optometry, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6011-0365
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INAston University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current understanding of clinical approaches and barriers in managing childhood myopia among Indian optometrists is limited. This research underscores the necessity and relevance of evidence-based practice guidelines by exploring their knowledge, attitude, and practice towards childhood myopia. A self-administered internet-based 26-item survey was circulated online among practicing optometrists in India. The questions assessed the demographics, knowledge, self-reported clinical practice behavior, barriers, source of information guiding their management, and extent of adult caregiver engagement for childhood myopia. Of 393 responses, a significant proportion of respondents (32.6-92.4%) were unaware of the ocular complications associated with high myopia, with less than half (46.5%) routinely performing ocular biometry in clinical practice. Despite the growing awareness of emerging myopia management options, the uptake remains generally poor, with single-vision distance full-correction spectacles (70.3%) being the most common mode of vision correction. Barriers to adopting optimal myopia care are medicolegal concerns, absence of clinical practice guidelines, and inadequate consultation time. Own clinical experience and original research articles were the primary sources of information supporting clinical practice. Most (>70%) respondents considered involving the adult caregiver in their child's clinical decision-making process. While practitioners' awareness and activity of newer myopia management strategies are improving, there is plenty of scope for its enhancement. The importance of evidence-based practice guidelines and continuing education on myopia control might help practitioners enhance their clinical decision-making skills.

Indexed as

barrierschildhood myopiaclinical decision-makingmyopia complicationsmyopia controlmyopia managementoptometric practicesurvey

Identifiers

PMID38651443
PMCPMC11036249
OpenAlexW4394845162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.