Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38651399›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2024

Long-Term Follow-Up Cares and Check Initiative: A Program to Advance Long-Term Follow-Up in Newborns Identified with a Disease through Newborn Screening.

Mei Lietsch, Kee Chan, Jennifer Taylor, Bo Hoon Lee, Emma Ciafaloni, Jennifer M Kwon, Megan A Waldrop, Russell J Butterfield, Geetanjali Rathore, Aravindhan Veerapandiyan and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Mei LietschAmerican College of Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-5286-2293
Kee ChanAmerican College of Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Jennifer TaylorAmerican College of Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6942-1696
Bo Hoon LeeDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Emma CiafaloniDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA.
Jennifer M KwonDepartment of Neurology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
Megan A WaldropCenter for Gene Therapy, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA.
Russell J ButterfieldDepartment of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8452-7189
Geetanjali RathoreDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Aravindhan VeerapandiyanDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3065-3956
Arya KapilDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA.
Julie A ParsonsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3450-762X
Melissa GibbonsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Amy BrowerAmerican College of Genetics and Genomics, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6621-1247
American College of Medical Genetics · USArkansas Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Rochester · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

HRSA HHS HRSA-21-079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States and around the world, newborns are screened on a population basis for conditions benefiting from pre-symptomatic diagnosis and treatment. The number of screened conditions continues to expand as novel technologies for screening, diagnosing, treating, and managing disease are discovered. While screening all newborns facilitates early diagnosis and treatment, most screened conditions are treatable but not curable. Patients identified by newborn screening often require lifelong medical management and community support to achieve the best possible outcome. To advance the long-term follow-up of infants identified through newborn screening (NBS), the Long-Term Follow-up Cares and Check Initiative (LTFU-Cares and Check) designed, implemented, and evaluated a system of longitudinal data collection and annual reporting engaging parents, clinical providers, and state NBS programs. The LTFU-Cares and Check focused on newborns identified with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) through NBS and the longitudinal health information prioritized by parents and families. Pediatric neurologists who care for newborns with SMA entered annual data, and data tracking and visualization tools were delivered to state NBS programs with a participating clinical center. In this publication, we report on the development, use of, and preliminary results from the LTFU-Cares and Check Initiative, which was designed as a comprehensive model of LTFU. We also propose next steps for achieving the goal of a national system of LTFU for individuals with identified conditions by meaningfully engaging public health agencies, clinicians, parents, families, and communities.

Indexed as

long-term follow-up (LTFU)newborn screening (NBS)spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

Identifiers

PMID38651399
PMCPMC11036280
OpenAlexW4394932992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.