Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38651039›Full record

ArticleJAAD international2024

Integration of a deep learning basal cell carcinoma detection and tumor mapping algorithm into the Mohs micrographic surgery workflow and effects on clinical staffing: A simulated, retrospective study.

Rachael Chacko, Matthew J Davis, Joshua Levy, Matthew LeBoeuf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAAD international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachael ChackoGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Matthew J DavisDepartment of Dermatology, Dartmouth Health, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Joshua LevyGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Matthew LeBoeufGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled tools have been proposed as 1 solution to improve health care delivery. However, research on downstream effects of AI integration into the clinical workflow is lacking. Objective: We aim to analyze how integration of an automated basal cell carcinoma detection and tumor mapping algorithm in a Mohs micrographic surgery unit impacts the work efficiency of clinical and laboratory staff. Methods: Slide, staff, and histotechnician waiting times were analyzed over a 20-day period in a Mohs micrographic surgery unit. A simulated AI workflow was created and the time differences between the real and simulated workflows were compared. Results: Simulated nonautonomous algorithm integration led to savings of 35.6% of slide waiting time, 18.4% of staff waiting time, and 18.6% of histotechnician waiting time per day. Algorithm integration on days with increased reconstruction complexity resulted in the greatest time savings. Limitations: One Mohs micrographic surgery unit was analyzed and simulated AI integration was performed retrospectively. Conclusions: AI integration results in reduced staff waiting times, enabling increased productivity and a streamlined clinical workflow. Schedules containing surgical cases with either increased repair complexity or numerous tumor removal stages stand to benefit most. However, significant logistical challenges must be addressed before broad adoption into clinical practice is realistic.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinical researchdeep learninggeneral dermatologymedical dermatologyoncologysurgery

Identifiers

PMID38651039
PMCPMC11033206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.