Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650961›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2024

Enhancing portfolio management using artificial intelligence: literature review.

Kristina Sutiene, Peter Schwendner, Ciprian Sipos, Luis Lorenzo, Miroslav Mirchev, Petre Lameski, Audrius Kabasinskas, Chemseddine Tidjani, Belma Ozturkkal, Jurgita Cerneviciene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kristina SutieneDepartment of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Peter SchwendnerSchool of Management and Law, Institute of Wealth and Asset Management, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Ciprian SiposDepartment of Economics and Modelling, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
Luis LorenzoFaculty of Statistic Studies, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Miroslav MirchevFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Petre LameskiFaculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Skopje, North Macedonia.
Audrius KabasinskasDepartment of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Chemseddine TidjaniDivision of Firms and Industrial Economics, Research Center in Applied Economics for Development, Algiers, Algeria.
Belma OzturkkalDepartment of International Trade and Finance, Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Jurgita CernevicieneDepartment of Mathematical Modeling, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building an investment portfolio is a problem that numerous researchers have addressed for many years. The key goal has always been to balance risk and reward by optimally allocating assets such as stocks, bonds, and cash. In general, the portfolio management process is based on three steps: planning, execution, and feedback, each of which has its objectives and methods to be employed. Starting from Markowitz's mean-variance portfolio theory, different frameworks have been widely accepted, which considerably renewed how asset allocation is being solved. Recent advances in artificial intelligence provide methodological and technological capabilities to solve highly complex problems, and investment portfolio is no exception. For this reason, the paper reviews the current state-of-the-art approaches by answering the core question of how artificial intelligence is transforming portfolio management steps. Moreover, as the use of artificial intelligence in finance is challenged by transparency, fairness and explainability requirements, the case study of

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceasset allocationexplainabilitymachine learningoptimizationportfoliorebalancingregulation

Identifiers

PMID38650961
PMCPMC11033520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.