Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650909›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

"We thought we were stronger than we were": adopters' narratives about the adoption journey and disruption.

Anca Bejenaru, Sergiu Raiu, Mihai Iovu, Alina Negoescu, Sorina Corman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anca BejenaruDepartment of Social Work, Journalism, Public Relations, and Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Sergiu RaiuDepartment of Social Work, Journalism, Public Relations, and Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Mihai IovuDepartment of Social Work, Journalism, Public Relations, and Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Alina NegoescuDepartment of Applied Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Military Sciences, Nicolae Bălcescu Land Forces Academy, Sibiu, Romania.
Sorina CormanDepartment of Social Work, Journalism, Public Relations, and Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although the majority of adoptive families remain stable, some of them break up prematurely. Methods: Adopting a qualitative approach, this study gave voice to seven adoption applicants who began the adoption journey with one or more children but did not complete the legal process. Our goal was to understand their experiences throughout the adoption process and disruption. Results: The results show how adoption applicants went, in a short period, from the excitement of finding a child or sibling group to disillusionment and trauma. The main risk factors that hinder adoption stability include unrealistic expectations, intuitive choice of the child in the absence of accurate information, challenges posed by the child's particular characteristics, and lack of professional support. Discussion: Our study highlights the need for adopters to be assisted throughout the entire process by specialists, to be better prepared to deal with the complex needs of children in the protection system, and to facilitate their access to a complex of specialized services to meet the different needs of every family.

Indexed as

adopters’ experiencesadoption disruptionadoption supportpsychological and social servicesspecial needs adoption

Identifiers

PMID38650909
PMCPMC11033425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.