Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650644›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Magnification in preclinical procedures: effect on muscle activity and angular deviations of the neck and trunk.

Júlia Margato Pazos, Ana Flávia Ribeiro Monteiro Fernandes, Edson Donizetti Verri, Guilherme Gallo Costa Gomes, Simone Cecílio Hallak Regalo, Patricia Petromilli Nordi Sasso Garcia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Training Program for the Use of Magnification Loupes in Dentistry.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Júlia Margato PazosDepartment of Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Flávia Ribeiro Monteiro FernandesDepartment of Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edson Donizetti VerriDepartment of Basic and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme Gallo Costa GomesDepartment of Basic and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Simone Cecílio Hallak RegaloDepartment of Basic and Oral Biology, School of Dentistry of Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patricia Petromilli Nordi Sasso GarciaDepartment of Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de Ribeirão Preto · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - FinanceSão Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effects of different magnification systems on the angular deviations of the neck and trunk and the muscle activities of the upper back and neck during preclinical cavity preparation. Methods: This was an experimental laboratory study, with the angular deviations from the neutral positions of the neck and trunk and the activities of the bilateral upper back (the descending and ascending trapezius) and neck (sternocleidomastoid) muscles as the dependent variables. The independent variables were the different magnification systems used (Simple, Galilean, and Keplerian loupes, with direct vision as the control) and prepared teeth (teeth 16, 26, 36, and 46). A dental mannequin phantom head with artificial resin teeth was used, and Class I cavity preparations for composite resin were performed on teeth 16, 26, 36, and 46 using a 1012 round diamond bur at low speed. To analyze the angular deviations, the postures adopted during the procedure were recorded using a tripod-mounted camera positioned to provide a lateral view of the operator. A trained researcher measured the angular deviations using the software entitled "Software for Postural Assessment"-SAPO (version 0.69). Bilateral muscle activity was assessed using surface electromyography. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and after verifying the assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity, two-way analysis of variance and the Tukey and Games-Howell post-hoc tests were used to compare the data ( Results: The angular deviation from the neutral position of the neck was found to be significantly higher during cavity preparations performed with the naked eye and the Simple loupe, irrespective of the prepared tooth. With regard to tooth location, the angular deviation of the neck was significantly greater during cavity preparation on teeth 16 and 26, and the angular deviation of the trunk was significantly greater during cavity preparation on tooth 26, regardless of the magnification system used. There were significant differences in right sternocleidomastoid muscle activity between the Simple, Galilean, and Keplerian loupes, with activity being the lowest for the Galilean loupe ( Conclusion: These results suggest that the Galilean loupe resulted in lower muscle activity in the neck and back regions and that the Galilean and Keplerian loupes resulted in less angular deviations of the neck and trunk during cavity preparation.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyManikinsNeck MusclesHumansMaleNeckPostureTorsoDentistryElectromyographyErgonomicsMagnificationOccupational healthRestorative procedures

Identifiers

PMID38650644
PMCPMC11034494
OpenAlexW4394958038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.