Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650484›Full record

ArticleJournal of chest surgery2024

Comparative Study of Indocyanine Green Intravenous Injection and the Inflation-Deflation Method for Assessing Resection Margins in Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Seon Yong Bae, Taeyoung Yun, Ji Hyeon Park, Bubse Na, Kwon Joong Na, Samina Park, Hyun Joo Lee, In Kyu Park, Chang Hyun Kang, Young Tae Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chest surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seon Yong BaeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3847-9865
Taeyoung YunDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-8493
Ji Hyeon ParkDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3272-0067
Bubse NaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3293-1446
Kwon Joong NaDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4158-9790
Samina ParkDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-2672
Hyun Joo LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3092-2167
In Kyu ParkDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3550-5554
Chang Hyun KangDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1612-1937
Young Tae KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-4881
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The inflation-deflation (ID) method has long been the standard for intraoperative margin assessment in segmentectomy. However, with advancements in vision technology, the use of near-infrared mapping with indocyanine green (ICG) has become increasingly common. This study was conducted to compare the perioperative outcomes and resection margins achieved using these methods. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent direct segmentectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer between January 2018 and September 2022. We compared perioperative factors, including bronchial and parenchymal resection margins, according to the margin assessment method and the type of segmentectomy performed. Since the ICG approach was adopted in April 2021, we also examined a recent subgroup of patients treated from then onward. Results: A total of 319 segmentectomies were performed. ID and ICG were utilized for 261 (81.8%) and 58 (18.2%) patients, respectively. Following April 2021, 61 patients (51.3%) were treated with ID, while 58 (48.7%) received ICG. We observed no significant difference in resection margins between ID and ICG for bronchial (2.7 cm vs. 2.3 cm, p=0.07) or parenchymal (2.5 cm vs. 2.3 cm, p=0.46) margins. Additionally, the length of hospitalization and the complication rate were comparable between groups. Analysis of the recent subgroup confirmed these findings, showing no significant differences in resection margins (bronchial: 2.6 cm vs. 2.3 cm, p=0.25; parenchymal: 2.4 cm vs. 2.3 cm, p=0.75), length of hospitalization, or complication rate. Conclusion: The perioperative outcomes and resection margins achieved using ID and ICG were comparable, suggesting that both methods can safely guide segmentectomy procedures.

Indexed as

Lung neoplasmsResection marginSegmentectomy

Identifiers

PMID38650484
PMCPMC11392716
OpenAlexW4395044915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.