Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650477›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2024

Radiomics for predicting MGMT status in cerebral glioblastoma: comparison of different MRI sequences.

Fei Zheng, Lingling Zhang, Hongyan Chen, Yuying Zang, Xuzhu Chen, Yiming Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fei ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, No. 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, P. R. China.
Lingling ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, No. 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, P. R. China.
Hongyan ChenDepartment of Radiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, No. 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, P. R. China.
Yuying ZangDepartment of Radiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, No. 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, P. R. China.
Xuzhu ChenDepartment of Radiology, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, No. 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, P. R. China.
Yiming LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, No. 119 South Fourth Ring West Road, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, P. R. China.
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z191100006619088National Natural Science Foundation of China 81772005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using radiomics to predict O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and compare the performances of different MRI sequences. Preoperative MRI scans from 215 patients were included in this retrospective study. After image preprocessing and feature extraction, two kinds of machine-learning models were established and compared for their performances. One kind was established using all MRI sequences (T1-weighted image, T2-weighted image, contrast enhancement, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI_b_high, DWI_b_low and apparent diffusion coefficient), and the other kind was based on single MRI sequence as listed above. For the machine-learning model based on all sequences, a total of seven radiomic features were selected with the Maximum Relevance and Minimum Redundancy algorithm. The predictive accuracy was 0.993 and 0.750 in the training and validation sets, respectively, and the area under curves were 1.000 and 0.754 in the two sets, respectively. For the machine-learning model based on single sequence, the numbers of selected features were 8, 10, 10, 13, 9, 7 and 6 for T1-weighted image, T2-weighted image, contrast enhancement, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI_b_high, DWI_b_low and apparent diffusion coefficient, respectively, with predictive accuracies of 0.797-1.000 and 0.583-0.694 in the training and validation sets, respectively, and the area under curves of 0.874-1.000 and 0.538-0.697 in the two sets, respectively. Specifically, T1-weighted image-based model performed best, while contrast enhancement-based model performed worst in the independent validation set. The machine-learning models based on seven different single MRI sequences performed differently in predicting O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase status in glioblastoma, while the machine-learning model based on the combination of all sequences performed best.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesGlioblastomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingTumor Suppressor ProteinsAdultAgedDNA MethylationFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteinsglioblastomamachine learningMGMTMRIradiomics

Identifiers

PMID38650477
PMCPMC11115443
OpenAlexW4395030679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.