Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650031›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2024

NSABP FB-10: a phase Ib/II trial evaluating ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with neratinib in women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.

Samuel A Jacobs, Ying Wang, Jame Abraham, Huichen Feng, Alberto J Montero, Corey Lipchik, Melanie Finnigan, Rachel C Jankowitz, Mohamad A Salkeni, Sai K Maley and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02236000 (A Phase Ib/II Dose-Escalation Study Evaluating the Combination of Trastuzumab Emtansine), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02236000 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase Ib/II Dose-Escalation Study Evaluating the Combination of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) With Neratinib in Women With Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNSABP Foundation IncRan2014 to 2021Enrolled49ConditionsBreast CancerArmsNeratinib, T-DM1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel A JacobsNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jacobssa1945@gmail.com.
Ying WangNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jame AbrahamNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Huichen FengNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alberto J MonteroNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Corey LipchikNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Melanie FinniganNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rachel C JankowitzNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mohamad A SalkeniNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sai K MaleyNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Shannon L PuhallaNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Fanny PietteInternational Drug Development Institute, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Katie QuinnGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Kyle ChangGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Rebecca J NagyGuardant Health, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Carmen J AllegraNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kelly VehecNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Norman WolmarkNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Peter C LucasNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ashok SrinivasanNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Katherine L Pogue-GeileNSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
NSABP Foundation · USGuardant (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USInternational Drug Development Institute (Belgium) · BEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Florida Health · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe previously reported our phase Ib trial, testing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of T-DM1 + neratinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients with ERBB2 amplification in ctDNA had deeper and more durable responses. This study extends these observations with in-depth analysis of molecular markers and mechanisms of resistance in additional patients.

methodsForty-nine HER2-positive patients (determined locally) who progressed on-treatment with trastuzumab + pertuzumab were enrolled in this phase Ib/II study. Mutations and HER2 amplifications were assessed in ctDNA before (C1D1) and on-treatment (C2D1) with the Guardant360 assay. Archived tissue (TP0) and study entry biopsies (TP1) were assayed for whole transcriptome, HER2 copy number, and mutations, with Ampli-Seq, and centrally for HER2 with CLIA assays. Patient responses were assessed with RECIST v1.1, and Molecular Response with the Guardant360 Response algorithm.

resultsThe ORR in phase II was 7/22 (32%), which included all patients who had at least one dose of study therapy. In phase I, the ORR was 12/19 (63%), which included only patients who were considered evaluable, having received their first scan at 6 weeks. Central confirmation of HER2-positivity was found in 83% (30/36) of the TP0 samples. HER2-amplified ctDNA was found at C1D1 in 48% (20/42) of samples. Patients with ctHER2-amp versus non-amplified HER2 ctDNA determined in C1D1 ctDNA had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS): 480 days versus 60 days (P = 0.015). Molecular Response scores were significantly associated with both PFS (HR 0.28, 0.09-0.90, P = 0.033) and best response (P = 0.037). All five of the patients with ctHER2-amp at C1D1 who had undetectable ctDNA after study therapy had an objective response. Patients whose ctHER2-amp decreased on-treatment had better outcomes than patients whose ctHER2-amp remained unchanged. HER2 RNA levels show a correlation to HER2 CLIA IHC status and were significantly higher in patients with clinically documented responses compared to patients with progressive disease (P = 0.03).

conclusionsThe following biomarkers were associated with better outcomes for patients treated with T-DM1 + neratinib: (1) ctHER2-amp (C1D1) or in TP1; (2) Molecular Response scores; (3) loss of detectable ctDNA; (4) RNA levels of HER2; and (5) on-treatment loss of detectable ctHER2-amp. HER2 transcriptional and IHC/FISH status identify HER2-low cases (IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ and FISH negative) in these heavily anti-HER2 treated patients. Due to the small number of patients and samples in this study, the associations we have shown are for hypothesis generation only and remain to be validated in future studies. Clinical Trials registration NCT02236000.

Indexed as

Ado-Trastuzumab EmtansineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesQuinolinesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm MetastasisTrastuzumabAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesneratinibQuinolinesTrastuzumabClinical trialctDNA HER2 amplificationMetastatic breast cancerNeratinib + t-DM1

Identifiers

PMID38650031
PMCPMC11036567
OpenAlexW4394998498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.