ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024
Learning symmetry-aware atom mapping in chemical reactions through deep graph matching.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- RXNMapper-v2: updated validation and evaluation on expanded chemical space.Digital discovery · 2026Article
- CBR-db: A Cheminformatic Database for Biochemical Reaction Analysis.ACS synthetic biology · 2026Article
- A cross-attentive multi-task graph learning framework for chemical reaction modeling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- QMGBP-DL: a deep learning and machine learning approach for quantum molecular graph band-gap prediction.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Enhancing atom mapping with multitask learning and symmetry-aware deep graph matching.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate atom mapping, which establishes correspondences between atoms in reactants and products, is a crucial step in analyzing chemical reactions. In this paper, we present a novel end-to-end approach that formulates the atom mapping problem as a deep graph matching task. Our proposed model, AMNet (Atom Matching Network), utilizes molecular graph representations and employs various atom and bond features using graph neural networks to capture the intricate structural characteristics of molecules, ensuring precise atom correspondence predictions. Notably, AMNet incorporates the consideration of molecule symmetry, enhancing accuracy while simultaneously reducing computational complexity. The integration of the Weisfeiler-Lehman isomorphism test for symmetry identification refines the model's predictions. Furthermore, our model maps the entire atom set in a chemical reaction, offering a comprehensive approach beyond focusing solely on the main molecules in reactions. We evaluated AMNet's performance on a subset of USPTO reaction datasets, addressing various tasks, including assessing the impact of molecular symmetry identification, understanding the influence of feature selection on AMNet performance, and comparing its performance with the state-of-the-art method. The result reveals an average accuracy of 97.3% on mapped atoms, with 99.7% of reactions correctly mapped when the correct mapped atom is within the top 10 predicted atoms.Scientific contributionThe paper introduces a novel end-to-end deep graph matching model for atom mapping, utilizing molecular graph representations to capture structural characteristics effectively. It enhances accuracy by integrating symmetry detection through the Weisfeiler-Lehman test, reducing the number of possible mappings and improving efficiency. Unlike previous methods, it maps the entire reaction, not just main components, providing a comprehensive view. Additionally, by integrating efficient graph matching techniques, it reduces computational complexity, making atom mapping more feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.