Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38650012›Full record

Observational studyBiology of sex differences2024

Sex differences of post-Covid patients undergoing outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.

Alexander Kautzky, Stephan Nopp, Dietlinde Gattinger, Milos Petrovic, Martin Antlinger, Dustin Schomacker, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Ralf Harun Zwick

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Biology of sex differences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexander KautzkyClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University if Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stephan NoppClinical Division of Haematology and Haemostaseology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dietlinde GattingerOutpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Therme Wien Med, Vienna, Austria.
Milos PetrovicOutpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Therme Wien Med, Vienna, Austria.
Martin AntlingerClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University if Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dustin SchomackerClinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University if Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra Kautzky-WillerClinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ralf Harun ZwickOutpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Therme Wien Med, Vienna, Austria. ralfharun@hotmail.com.ORCID 0009-0008-1965-7586

Funding

Medizinisch-wissenschaftlicher Fonds des Bürgermeisters der Stadt Wien 21224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing years of pandemic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections labelled Covid-19, long lasting impairment summarized as post-Covid syndrome (PCS) challenges worldwide healthcare. Patients benefit from rehabilitation programs, but sex specific aspects of improvement remain little understood. The aim of the study was to assess whether women and men differ in response to outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for PCS.

methods263 (54.4% female) patients partaking in outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (OPR) due to PCS between March 2020 and July 2022 were included in a prospective observational cohort study. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and before discharge from OPR and included six-minute walking distance (6MWD), 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1), diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), dyspnea (medical research council scale), and post-Covid functional status scale (PCFS). Sexspecific changes in outcomes following OPR were assessed by linear mixed model and presented as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals. Linear regression was applied to test whether 6MWD correlates with PCFS and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in 6MWD regarding an improvement of at least one point in PCFS was computed with logistic regression.

resultsSignificant improvement throughout OPR was observed for all outcomes (all p < 0.0001). Despite less severe Covid-19 infections, PCFS scores remained higher in females after OPR (p = 0.004) and only 19.4% of women compared to 38.5% of men achieved remission of functional impairment. At baseline as well as after OPR, females showed higher symptom load compared to men in dyspnea (p = 0.0027) and scored lower in FEV1 (p = 0.009) and MIP (p = 0.0006) assessment. Performance in 6MWD was comparable between men and women. An increase of 35 m in 6MWD was computed as minimal clinically important difference to improve functional impairment.

conclusionBoth subjective symptoms such as fatigue and dyspnea and objective impairment in performance in pulmonary function were more frequently observed among women. Despite improvement throughout OPR in both women and men, the sex-gap in symptom load could not be closed as women less often achieved remission from functional impairment due to PCS. Intensified treatment of these symptoms should be considered in women undergoing rehabilitation for PCS.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutpatientsPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeProspective StudiesSex Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID38650012
PMCPMC11034076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.