Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649995›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Best practice transfer by public health nurses in Japan: actual conditions and related factors.

Mana Fujioka, Reiko Okamoto, Keiko Miyamoto, Keiko Koide, Masako Kageyama, Kazuko Saeki, Kazue Hirokane, Fusami Nagano, Shinji Takemura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mana FujiokaFormer Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine , Yamadaoka 1-7, 565-0871, Suita-city, Osaka, Japan.
Reiko OkamotoDivision of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-city, Japan. reiko@sahs.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Keiko MiyamotoDivision of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-city, Japan.
Keiko KoideDivision of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-city, Japan.
Masako KageyamaDivision of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-city, Japan.
Kazuko SaekiFaculty of Nursing, Toyama Prefectural University, Nishi-nagae 2-2-78, 930-0975, Toyama-city, Toyama, Japan.
Kazue HirokaneFaculty of Nursing, Hyogo Medical University, Minatojima 1-3-6, Chuo-ku, 650-8530, Kobe-city, Hyogo, Japan.
Fusami NaganoFaculty of Nursing, Fukuyama Heisei University, Kamiiwanari-syoto 117-1, Miyuki-town, 720-0001, Fukuyama-city, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shinji TakemuraDepartment of Health Policy and Technology Assessment, National Institute of Public Health, Wako-city-minami 2-3-6, 351-0197, Wako-city, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19H03961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe workload of public health nurses (PHNs) working for local governments has been increasing as health issues become more diverse and complicated. Even amidst the ongoing administrative and fiscal reforms, there is an urgent need to ensure how effectively and efficiently public health nurses can practice in health service development. The objective of this research was to clarify the actual conditions of best practice transfer (BPT) and its related factors.

methodsAn anonymous postal and self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted among PHNs working at 334 sites, including the local government offices and health centers across Japan, and analysed mainly through logistic regression analysis.

resultsOne hundred eighty-five of the 334 institutions (55.4%) agreed to participate, and of the 966 questionnaire forms distributed, 709 forms (73.4%) were collected, of which 702 responses (72.7%) were valid. Although less than half (43.2%) have experience in BPT in health service development, more than 80% are willing to perform going forward. Significant factors for both the group with experience in BPT and the group with willingness to perform include an organizational culture that promotes BPT, as well as multiple elements of the workplace environment and facilitating factors related to knowledge and learning. The experienced group recognised the needs for criteria to evaluate the adaptability of best practice, while the willing group, to evaluate the quality of practice.

conclusionsThrough a nationwide survey, this research elucidated for the first time the actual conditions of BPT by PHNs in Japan and related factors. The results indicated the importance of developing a system to promote BPT at the workplace level, also highlighted the importance for practitioners and experts, including researchers, to work together to develop practical guidelines to ensure evidence-based practices. Urgent actions are needed for the national and local governments to develop a system to promote BPT from diverse perspectives, building on the findings of this research.

Indexed as

Actual conditions surveyBest practiceImplementation sciencePolicy transferPublic health nurse

Identifiers

PMID38649995
PMCPMC11034165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.