Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649994›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2024

Secondary metabolic profiling, antioxidant potential, enzyme inhibitory activities and in silico and ADME studies: a multifunctional approach to reveal medicinal and industrial potential of Tanacetum falconeri.

Muhammad Imran Tousif, Zaheer Abbas, Mamona Nazir, Muhammad Saleem, Saba Tauseef, Areeba Hassan, Sajid Ali, Maqsood Ahmed, Jallat Khan, Gokhan Zengin and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Muhammad Imran TousifDepartment of Chemistry, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan. mimrantousif@gmail.com.
Zaheer AbbasDepartment of Botany, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.
Mamona NazirDepartment of Chemistry, Government Sadiq College Women University Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Muhammad SaleemInstitute of Chemistry, Baghdad Campus, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan. m.saleem@iub.edu.pk.
Saba TauseefDr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research., International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan.
Areeba HassanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology & Bioinformatics, Baghdad Campus, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Sajid AliDepartment of Information Sciences, Division of Science and Technology, University of Education Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Maqsood AhmedDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
Jallat KhanInstitute of Chemistry, Khwaja Fareed University of Engineering & Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan.
Gokhan ZenginScience Faculty, Department of Biology, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey. gokhanzengin@selcuk.edu.tr.
Abeer HashemBotany and Microbiology Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid F AlmutairiPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Graciela Dolores Avila-QuezadaFacultad de Ciencias Agrotecnológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, 31350, Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México.
Elsayed Fathi Abd-AllahPlant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box. 2460, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Islamia University of Bahawalpur · PKKing Saud University · SAUniversity of Okara · PKAutonomous University of Chihuahua · MXGovernment Sadiq College Women University · PKKhwaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology · PKSelçuk University · TRUniversity of Education · PKUniversity of Karachi · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tanacetum falconeri is a significant flowering plant that possesses cytotoxic, insecticidal, antibacterial, and phytotoxic properties. Its chemodiversity and bioactivities, however, have not been thoroughly investigated. In this work, several extracts from various parts of T. falconeri were assessed for their chemical profile, antioxidant activity, and potential for enzyme inhibition. The total phenolic contents of T. falconeri varied from 40.28 ± 0.47 mg GAE/g to 11.92 ± 0.22 mg GAE/g in various extracts, while flavonoid contents were found highest in TFFM (36.79 ± 0.36 mg QE/g extract) and lowest (11.08 ± 0.22 mg QE/g extract) in TFSC (chloroform extract of stem) in similar pattern as found in total phenolic contents. Highest DPPH inhibition was observed for TFFC (49.58 ± 0.11 mg TE/g extract) and TFSM (46.33 ± 0.10 mg TE/g extract), whereas, TFSM was also potentially active against (98.95 ± 0.57 mg TE/g) ABTS radical. In addition, TFSM was also most active in metal reducing assays: CUPRAC (151.76 ± 1.59 mg TE/g extract) and FRAP (101.30 ± 0.32 mg TE/g extract). In phosphomolybdenum assay, the highest activity was found for TFFE (1.71 ± 0.03 mg TE/g extract), TFSM (1.64 ± 0.035 mg TE/g extract), TFSH (1.60 ± 0.033 mg TE/g extract) and TFFH (1.58 ± 0.08 mg TE/g extract), while highest metal chelating activity was recorded for TFSH (25.93 ± 0.79 mg EDTAE/g extract), TFSE (22.90 ± 1.12 mg EDTAE/g extract) and TFSC (19.31 ± 0.50 mg EDTAE/g extract). In biological screening, all extracts had stronger inhibitory capacity against AChE while in case of BChE the chloroform extract of flower (TFFC) and stem (TFSC) showed the highest activities with inhibitory values of 2.57 ± 0.24 and 2.10 ± 0.18 respectively. Similarly, TFFC and TFSC had stronger inhibitory capacity (1.09 ± 0.015 and 1.08 ± 0.002 mmol ACAE/g extract) against α-Amylase and (0.50 ± 0.02 and 0.55 ± 0.02 mmol ACAE/g extract) α-Glucosidase. UHPLC-MS study of methanolic extract revealed the presence of 133 components including sterols, triterpenes, flavonoids, alkaloids, and coumarins. The total phenolic contents were substantially linked with all antioxidant assays in multivariate analysis. These findings were validated by docking investigations, which revealed that the selected compounds exhibited high binding free energy with the enzymes tested. Finally, it was found that T. falconeri is a viable industrial crop with potential use in the production of functional goods and nutraceuticals.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsPlant ExtractsTanacetumComputer SimulationEnzyme InhibitorsFlavonoidsPhenolsSecondary MetabolismAntioxidantsEnzyme InhibitorsFlavonoidsPhenolsPlant ExtractsEnzyme inhibition activitiesIn silico studiesTanacetum falconeriTotal bioactive contents; antioxidant activities

Identifiers

PMID38649994
PMCPMC11034146
OpenAlexW4395005339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.