ArticleBMC medical education2024
Artificial intelligence and medical education: application in classroom instruction and student assessment using a pharmacology & therapeutics case study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI-supported case-based learning in medical education: a comprehensive scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence (AI) for social innovation in health education: promoting health literacy through personalized ai-driven learning tools - a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- The potentials and challenges of integrating generative artificial intelligence (AI) in dental and orthodontic education: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Measuring AI literacy in medical students: scale development and validation within a self-determination theory framework.Medical education online · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Angoff Standard Setting for Multiple-Choice Examinations in Medical Education: Comparative Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluating and leveraging large language models in clinical pharmacology and therapeutics assessment: From exam takers to exam shapers.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Designing equitable and inclusive assessments in pharmacology: Insights from education practices in medical sciences.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Mapping Current Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacology Education via a Scoping Review.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Prescribing competence: The pros and cons of different methods for assessment.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted feedback in pharmacology education: a pilot evaluation of a custom generative model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Enhancing Pharmacology Education Through Collaborative Innovation: The Evolution and Future of PRORENATA at an Engineering-Based Medical Program.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Visual recognition limitations in multimodal large language models: A comparative analysis of histological image interpretation.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted training for rib fracture interpretation: a prospective study in undergraduate medical students.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Observational
- Enhancing dental clinical education through AI: insights into post-clinical summaries.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A scoping review of the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in health profession education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Objective Structured Clinical Examination Generation in Digital Health Education: Comparative Analysis of Three GPT-4o Configurations.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Enhancing Medical Education: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Teaching-Learning Process.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
- A narrative discussion on the impact of respiratory infectious diseases on dental education in China: implications for curriculum design and student outcomes.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- ChatGPT for diabetes education: potential, accuracy, and accessibility in patient support.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) tools are designed to create or generate content from their trained parameters using an online conversational interface. AI has opened new avenues in redefining the role boundaries of teachers and learners and has the potential to impact the teaching-learning process.
methodsIn this descriptive proof-of- concept cross-sectional study we have explored the application of three generative AI tools on drug treatment of hypertension theme to generate: (1) specific learning outcomes (SLOs); (2) test items (MCQs- A type and case cluster; SAQs; OSPE); (3) test standard-setting parameters for medical students.
resultsAnalysis of AI-generated output showed profound homology but divergence in quality and responsiveness to refining search queries. The SLOs identified key domains of antihypertensive pharmacology and therapeutics relevant to stages of the medical program, stated with appropriate action verbs as per Bloom's taxonomy. Test items often had clinical vignettes aligned with the key domain stated in search queries. Some test items related to A-type MCQs had construction defects, multiple correct answers, and dubious appropriateness to the learner's stage. ChatGPT generated explanations for test items, this enhancing usefulness to support self-study by learners. Integrated case-cluster items had focused clinical case description vignettes, integration across disciplines, and targeted higher levels of competencies. The response of AI tools on standard-setting varied. Individual questions for each SAQ clinical scenario were mostly open-ended. The AI-generated OSPE test items were appropriate for the learner's stage and identified relevant pharmacotherapeutic issues. The model answers supplied for both SAQs and OSPEs can aid course instructors in planning classroom lessons, identifying suitable instructional methods, establishing rubrics for grading, and for learners as a study guide. Key lessons learnt for improving AI-generated test item quality are outlined.
conclusionsAI tools are useful adjuncts to plan instructional methods, identify themes for test blueprinting, generate test items, and guide test standard-setting appropriate to learners' stage in the medical program. However, experts need to review the content validity of AI-generated output. We expect AIs to influence the medical education landscape to empower learners, and to align competencies with curriculum implementation. AI literacy is an essential competency for health professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.