Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649836›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Mora: abundance aware metagenomic read re-assignment for disentangling similar strains.

Andrew Zheng, Jim Shaw, Yun William Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew ZhengMathematics, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M3R 0A3, Canada.
Jim ShawMathematics, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M3R 0A3, Canada. jshaw@math.toronto.edu.
Yun William YuMathematics, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, Ontario, M3R 0A3, Canada. ywyu@cmu.edu.

Funding

Ministère de la Défense Nationale DGDND-2022-03074Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CGS-DNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2022- 03074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaxonomic classification of reads obtained by metagenomic sequencing is often a first step for understanding a microbial community, but correctly assigning sequencing reads to the strain or sub-species level has remained a challenging computational problem.

resultsWe introduce Mora, a MetagenOmic read Re-Assignment algorithm capable of assigning short and long metagenomic reads with high precision, even at the strain level. Mora is able to accurately re-assign reads by first estimating abundances through an expectation-maximization algorithm and then utilizing abundance information to re-assign query reads. The key idea behind Mora is to maximize read re-assignment qualities while simultaneously minimizing the difference from estimated abundance levels, allowing Mora to avoid over assigning reads to the same genomes. On simulated diverse reads, this allows Mora to achieve F1 scores comparable to other algorithms while having less runtime. However, Mora significantly outshines other algorithms on very similar reads. We show that the high penalty of over assigning reads to a common reference genome allows Mora to accurately infer correct strains for real data in the form of E. coli reads.

conclusionsMora is a fast and accurate read re-assignment algorithm that is modularized, allowing it to be incorporated into general metagenomics and genomics workflows. It is freely available at https://github.com/AfZheng126/MORA .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMetagenomicsEscherichia coliGenome, BacterialMetagenomeSequence Analysis, DNASoftwareAbundance quantificationMetagenomicsRead re-assignment

Identifiers

PMID38649836
PMCPMC11035124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.