ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Increasing Fluid Viscosity Ensures Consistent Single-Cell Encapsulation.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of droplet size on the encapsulation efficiency of microparticles in passive microfluidic systems.Biomedical microdevices · 2026Article
- An integrated microfluidic culture model for photodynamic therapy evaluations under normoxic and hypoxic conditions.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-throughput single-cell analysis typically relies on the isolation of cells of interest in separate compartments for subsequent phenotypic or genotypic characterization. Using microfluidics, this is achieved by isolating individual cells in microdroplets or microwells. However, due to cell-to-cell variability in size, shape, and density, the cell capture efficiencies may vary significantly. This variability can negatively impact the measurements and introduce undesirable artifacts when trying to isolate and characterize heterogeneous cell populations. In this study, we show that single-cell isolation biases in microfluidics can be circumvented by increasing the viscosity of fluids in which cells are dispersed. At a viscosity of 40-50 cP (cP), the cell sedimentation is effectively reduced, resulting in a steady cell flow inside the microfluidics chip and consistent encapsulation in water-in-oil droplets over extended periods of time. This approach allows nearly all cells in a sample to be isolated with the same efficiency, irrespective of their type. Our results show that increased fluid viscosity, rather than cell-adjusted density, provides a more reliable approach to mitigate single-cell isolation biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.