Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649687›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Modeling health and well-being measures using ZIP code spatial neighborhood patterns.

Abhi Jain, Michael LaValley, Kimberly Dukes, Kevin Lane, Michael Winter, Keith R Spangler, Nina Cesare, Biqi Wang, Michael Rickles, Shariq Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abhi JainDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Michael LaValleyDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Kimberly DukesDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA. dukeska@bu.edu.
Kevin LaneDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Michael WinterBiostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Keith R SpanglerDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Nina CesareBiostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Biqi WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA.
Michael RicklesSharecare, Research and Outcomes, Atlanta, 30305, USA.
Shariq MohammedDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, 02118, USA. shariqm@bu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual-level assessment of health and well-being permits analysis of community well-being and health risk evaluations across several dimensions of health. It also enables comparison and rankings of reported health and well-being for large geographical areas such as states, metropolitan areas, and counties. However, there is large variation in reported well-being within such large spatial units underscoring the importance of analyzing well-being at more granular levels, such as ZIP codes. In this paper, we address this problem by modeling well-being data to generate ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA)-level rankings through spatially informed statistical modeling. We build regression models for individual-level overall well-being index and scores from five subscales (Physical, Financial, Social, Community, Purpose) using individual-level demographic characteristics as predictors while including a ZCTA-level spatial effect. The ZCTA neighborhood information is incorporated by using a graph Laplacian matrix; this enables estimation of the effect of a ZCTA on well-being using individual-level data from that ZCTA as well as by borrowing information from neighboring ZCTAs. We deploy our model on well-being data for the U.S. states of Massachusetts and Georgia. We find that our model can capture the effects of demographic features while also offering spatial effect estimates for all ZCTAs, including ones with no observations, under certain conditions. These spatial effect estimates provide community health and well-being rankings of ZCTAs, and our method can be deployed more generally to model other outcomes that are spatially dependent as well as data from other states or groups of states.

Indexed as

Residence CharacteristicsAdultAgedFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalNeighborhood Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID38649687
PMCPMC11035567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.