Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649673›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2024

Baseline Characteristics and mNAPSI Change from Baseline Scores Through Month 12 for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Nail Psoriasis Treated with Biologics from PSoHO.

Elisabeth Riedl, Andreas Pinter, Shirin Zaheri, Antonio Costanzo, Alan Brnabic, Bruce Konicek, Robert McKenzie, Anastasia Lampropoulou, Mohamed El Rayes, Natalie Haustrup and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Elisabeth RiedlDepartment of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. elisabeth.riedl@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2765-5417
Andreas PinterUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Shirin ZaheriDepartment of Dermatology, The Harley Street Clinic, HCA Healthcare UK, London, UK.
Antonio CostanzoDivision of Dermatology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Alan BrnabicEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Bruce KonicekEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Robert McKenzieEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Anastasia LampropoulouEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Mohamed El RayesEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Natalie Haustrup *Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, USA.
Christopher Schuster *Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHumanitas University · ITMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNail psoriasis is highly prevalent among patients with psoriasis yet remains one of the most challenging areas to treat. To better understand the treatment landscape for psoriatic nail disease, more studies are needed that compare the effectiveness of different biologics for patients with nail psoriasis. This study contributes to this objective by directly comparing the effectiveness of approved biologics in improving nail psoriasis for patients up to month 12 in a real-world setting.

methodsPsoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. This study assessed the change in modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) score from baseline to months 3, 6 and 12 for 763 patients and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics versus other approved biologics, as well as ixekizumab versus secukinumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and adalimumab. Comparative adjusted analyses used frequentist model averaging (FMA). Least square mean difference (LSMD) in mNAPSI scores are presented as observed.

resultsIrrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline, the anti-IL-17A cohort had greater mean mNAPSI reductions from baseline compared to the other biologics cohort through month 12, reaching significance at months 3 and 6 in the adjusted analysis. For patients with moderate-to-severe nail psoriasis, ixekizumab showed numerically higher mean reductions in mNAPSI scores compared to all other studied biologics, reaching significance versus guselkumab at all timepoints and risankizumab at month 6.

conclusionThis real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and any severity of concomitant nail involvement had significantly faster and more substantial improvements in nail psoriasis up to month 6 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Of the individual biologics studied, ixekizumab showed the highest numerical improvements in nail psoriasis at month 12.

trial registrationEUPAS24207.

Identifiers

PMID38649673
PMCPMC11116304
OpenAlexW4394993376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.