Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649644›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2024

Analysis of modified ilib therapy in patients submitted to plastic surgery.

Patrícia Froes Meyer, Rafaella Rêgo Maia, Eneida de Morais Carreiro, Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da Silva, Stephany Luanna Queiroga Farias, Felice Picariello, Carla Érica Lima Medeiros, Danielli Malta Prata E Silva, Daniela Silva Salgado Barros, Vanessa Siqueira Roque and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrícia Froes MeyerInternational Research Group (IRG), Natal, Brazil.
Rafaella Rêgo MaiaFederal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil. maia.rafaella20@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7819-0690
Eneida de Morais CarreiroInternational Research Group (IRG), Natal, Brazil.
Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da SilvaFederal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Stephany Luanna Queiroga FariasPotiguar University - UNP, Natal, Brazil.
Felice PicarielloUniversity of the Study of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carla Érica Lima MedeirosChristus University Center, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Danielli Malta Prata E SilvaIBRA College, Caratinga, Brazil.
Daniela Silva Salgado BarrosClaretiano University Center, Batatais, Brazil.
Vanessa Siqueira RoqueEstácio de Sá University (UNESA), Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Lucas Peres de SousaPaulista University (UNIP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande · BRCentro Universitário Claretiano · BRUnichristus · BRUniversidade Paulista · BRUniversidade Potiguar · BRUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sample comprised 44 volunteers who had undergone some surgical procedure and were equally divided into four groups. G1 started the therapy 24 h after the surgical procedure with the device off. G2 followed the same time pattern, 24 h, but with the device turned on. G3 and G4 started therapy three days after the surgical procedure; in G3, the device was turned off, and in G4, the device remained on during therapy; each session lasted 30 min, using 660 nm (red), energy 180 J. For all groups, the therapy started with daily use for seven days and followed the interval use of three times a week until completed 21 days. The revaluation was performed after 7 and 21 days. The results found show changes in HR at rest, systolic and diastolic BP, and in peripheral oxygen saturation, which showed a significant difference in the groups that used on-therapy (p < 0.05). In the MCGILL Scale evaluation, the mean total score showed a more accentuated drop in the groups that used ILIB, (p < 0.05). ILIB may have prevented a more significant evolution of firosis levels; however, no changes were observed in the evaluation of sleep and anxiety. The application of the ILIB in patients undergoing plastic surgery was supported in terms of hemodynamics and pain; in addition, starting the ILIB application 24 h after the procedure proved to be more advantageous.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresAdultFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIlizarov TechniqueMaleMiddle AgedOxygen SaturationSurgery, PlasticYoung AdultILIBLaserPostoperativeQuestionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38649644
OpenAlexW4395013245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.