Observational studyJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2024
Layered plaque is associated with high levels of vascular inflammation and vulnerability in patients with stable angina pectoris.
Observational study in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04523194 (Massachusetts General Hospital and Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Coronary Imaging Collaboration), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Massachusetts General Hospital and Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital Coronary Imaging Collaboration
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coronary plaque healing: a safety net or a hazard indicator?Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Does Green Brazilian Propolis Extract Improve Functional Capacity in Symptomatic Chronic Coronary Disease?-A Pilot Randomized Trial.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SS-OCTA assessment of fundus microvascular changes and their correlation with coronary lesion severity in severe coronary heart disease.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Layered plaque, a signature of previous plaque destabilization and healing, is a known predictor for rapid plaque progression; however, the mechanism of which is unknown. The aim of the current study was to compare the level of vascular inflammation and plaque vulnerability in layered plaques to investigate possible mechanisms of rapid plaque progression. This is a retrospective, observational, single-center cohort study. Patients who underwent both coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for stable angina pectoris (SAP) were selected. Plaques were defined as any tissue (noncalcified, calcified, or mixed) within or adjacent to the lumen. Perivascular inflammation was measured by pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) attenuation at the plaque levels on CTA. Features of plaque vulnerability were assessed by OCT. Layered plaques were defined as plaques presenting one or more layers of different optical densities and a clear demarcation from underlying components on OCT. A total of 475 plaques from 195 patients who presented with SAP were included. Layered plaques (n = 241), compared with non-layered plaques (n = 234), had a higher level of vascular inflammation (-71.47 ± 10.74 HU vs. -73.69 ± 10.91 HU, P = 0.026) as well as a higher prevalence of the OCT features of plaque vulnerability, including lipid-rich plaque (83.8% vs. 66.7%, P < 0.001), thin-cap fibroatheroma (26.1% vs. 17.5%, P = 0.026), microvessels (61.8% vs. 34.6%, P < 0.001), and cholesterol crystals (38.6% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.003). Layered plaque was associated with a higher level of vascular inflammation and a higher prevalence of plaque vulnerability, which might play an important role in rapid plaque progression.Clinical trial registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04523194 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.