ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Comparison of clinicopathological and prognostic features of breast cancer patients younger than 40 years and older than 65 years.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to compare the clinicopathological and prognostic features of women aged 40 years and younger and 65 years and older with breast cancer.
methodsBetween January 2011 and December 2021, 136 female cases aged 40 years and younger and 223 female cases aged 65 and over were identified among all cases (1395 cases) registered as breast cancer in the file archives of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology for the study. A Chi-square (× 2) test was used for categorical variables, and an independent sample t-test for continuous variables. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier plots were used for survival analysis. For the statistical evaluation, p < 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsBoth overall survival (p < 0.01) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (p = 0.01) were significantly worse in the older group. BCSS were significantly worse in the older group in Luminal B (HER2-) (p = 0.013) and HR- HER2+ (p = 0.015) subtypes detected. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only the presence of metastases at diagnosis or follow-up (p < 0.001) and ECOG PS 2-3 status (p = 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of breast cancer-specific death.
conclusionTo our knowledge, no study directly compares these two groups. In our study, similar to many studies, more aggressive tumor features were found in young patients, but unlike many studies, mortality was found to be significantly higher in older patients. The presence of metastasis and poor ECOG PS were found to be the most influential factors in breast cancer-specific death risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.