Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649500›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024

Analysis of perinatal outcomes for emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies at 24-28 weeks of gestation.

Xiling Yi, Dan Zhang, Jing Yang, Hongyan Gao, Hengyu Cai, Jianping Cong, Chengli Lin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiling YiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China.
Dan ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China.
Jing YangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China. dxh27@Sina.com.ORCID 0009-0009-2556-9782
Hongyan GaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China.
Hengyu CaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China.
Jianping CongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China.
Chengli LinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shenyang Women's and Children's Hospital, Shenyang, 110000, Liaoning, China.
Shenyang First People's Hospital · CNLiaoning Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Shenyang Science and Technology Bureau 21-173-9-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cerclage is the only effective treatment for cervical insufficiency, effectively preventing late miscarriage and preterm birth. The effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) as an emergency treatment when the cervix is already dilated or when there is protrusion of the fetal membranes into the vagina remain controversial, especially in pregnancies at 24-28 weeks when the fetus is viable. There is still no consensus on whether emergency cervical cerclage should be performed in such cases. PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of emergency cervical cerclage in singleton pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation.

methodsThis study employed a single-center prospective cohort design, enrolling singleton pregnant women at 24-28 weeks of gestation with ultrasound or physical examination indicating cervical dilation or even membrane protrusion. Emergency cervical cerclage was compared with conservative treatment. The primary endpoints included a comprehensive assessment of perinatal pregnancy loss, significant neonatal morbidity, and adverse neonatal outcomes. Secondary endpoints included prolonged gestational age, preterm birth, neonatal hospitalization rate, premature rupture of membranes, and intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis.

resultsFrom June 2021 to March 2023, a total of 133 pregnant women participated in this study, with 125 completing the trial, and were allocated to either the Emergency Cervical Cerclage (ECC) group (72 cases) or the conservative treatment group (53 cases) based on informed consent from the pregnant women. The rate of adverse neonatal outcomes was 8.33% in the ECC group and 26.42% in the conservative treatment (CT) group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of perinatal pregnancy loss and significant neonatal morbidity. The conservative treatment group had a mean prolonged gestational age of 63.0 (23.0, 79.5) days, while the ECC group had 84.0 (72.5, 89.0) days, with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.001). Compared with CT group, the ECC group showed a significantly reduced incidence of preterm birth before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, with statistical significance (P = 0.046, 0.007, 0.001), as well as a significantly decreased neonatal hospitalization rate (P = 0.013, 0.031). Additionally, ECC treatment did not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis, with no statistically significant differences (P = 0.406, 0.397).

conclusionIn singleton pregnant women with cervical insufficiency at 24-28 weeks of gestation, emergency cervical cerclage can reduce adverse neonatal pregnancy outcomes, effectively prolong gestational age, decrease preterm births before 28 weeks, 32 weeks, and 34 weeks, lower neonatal hospitalization rates, and does not increase the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes or intrauterine infection/chorioamnionitis.

Indexed as

Cerclage, CervicalPremature BirthUterine Cervical IncompetenceAbortion, SpontaneousAdultEmergenciesEmergency TreatmentFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Trimester, SecondPremature Rupture of Fetal MembranesProspective Studies24–28 weeksAdverse neonatal outcomesCervical insufficiencyEmergency cervical cerclageSingleton pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38649500
PMCPMC11168987
OpenAlexW4395046490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.