ArticleNature human behaviour2024
Memorability shapes perceived time (and vice versa).
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The speed limit of visual perception: Bidirectional influence of image memorability and processing speed on perceived duration and recognition.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Factors underlying flicker-induced time dilation: Temporal frequency, semantic content, and subjective saliency of visual stimuli.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Reverse engineering what makes a symbol memorable.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Toward understanding the role of visual hierarchy in flicker-induced time dilation: A preregistered study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Characterization of the spatiotemporal representations of visual, semantic, and memorability features in the human brain.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Effects of physical effort on temporal processing.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2025Article
- Symmetrical and asymmetrical distortions in time and numerosity perception induced by chunked stimuli.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Image memorability influences memory for where the item was seen but not when.Memory & cognition · 2025Article
- Parahippocampal-ventromedial prefrontal cortex functional coupling mediates the association between subjective time perception and delay discounting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Event as the central construal of psychological time in humans.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Longitudinal Implementation of a Neurodevelopmental Screening Program for Children Born to Mothers Living With HIV in Maternal-Child Clinics in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS CareArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual stimuli are known to vary in their perceived duration. Some visual stimuli are also known to linger for longer in memory. Yet, whether these two features of visual processing are linked is unknown. Despite early assumptions that time is an extracted or higher-order feature of perception, more recent work over the past two decades has demonstrated that timing may be instantiated within sensory modality circuits. A primary location for many of these studies is the visual system, where duration-sensitive responses have been demonstrated. Furthermore, visual stimulus features have been observed to shift perceived duration. These findings suggest that visual circuits mediate or construct perceived time. Here we present evidence across a series of experiments that perceived time is affected by the image properties of scene size, clutter and memorability. More specifically, we observe that scene size and memorability dilate time, whereas clutter contracts it. Furthermore, the durations of more memorable images are also perceived more precisely. Conversely, the longer the perceived duration of an image, the more memorable it is. To explain these findings, we applied a recurrent convolutional neural network model of the ventral visual system, in which images are progressively processed over time. We find that more memorable images are processed faster, and that this increase in processing speed predicts both the lengthening and the increased precision of perceived durations. These findings provide evidence for a link between image features, time perception and memory that can be further explored with models of visual processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38649460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.