ArticleScientific reports2024
High space-time bandwidth product imaging in low coherence quantitative phase microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Current low coherence quantitative phase microscopy (LC-QPM) systems suffer from either reduced field of view (FoV) or reduced temporal resolution due to the short temporal coherence (TC) length of the light source. Here, we propose a hybrid, experimental and numerical approach to address this core problem associated with LC-QPM. We demonstrate high spatial resolution and high phase sensitivity in LC-QPM at high temporal resolution. High space-time bandwidth product is achieved by employing incoherent light source for sample illumination in QPM to increase the spatial resolution and single-shot Hilbert spiral transform (HST) based phase recovery algorithm to enhance the temporal resolution without sacrificing spatial resolution during the reconstruction steps. The high spatial phase sensitivity comes by default due to the use of incoherent light source in QPM which has low temporal coherence length and does not generate speckle noise and coherent noise. The spatial resolution achieved by the HST is slightly inferior to the temporal phase-shifting (TPS) method when tested on a specimen but surpasses that of the single-shot Fourier transform (FT) based phase recovery method. Contrary to HST method, FT method requires high density fringes for lossless phase recovery, which is difficult to achieve in LC-QPM over entire FoV. Consequently, integration of HST algorithm with LC-QPM system makes an attractive route. Here, we demonstrate scalable FoV and resolution in single-shot LC-QPM and experimentally corroborate it on a test object and on both live and fixed biological specimen such as MEF, U2OS and human red blood cells (RBCs). LC-QPM system with HST reconstruction offer high-speed single-shot QPM imaging at high phase sensitivity and high spatial resolution enabling us to study sub-cellular dynamic inside U2OS for extended duration (3 h) and observe high-speed (50 fps) dynamics of human RBCs. The experimental results validate the effectiveness of the present approach and will open new avenues in the domain of biomedical imaging in the future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.