Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649339›Full record

ReviewJournal of extracellular vesicles2024

Membranes on the move: The functional role of the extracellular vesicle membrane for contact-dependent cellular signalling.

Kevin Jahnke, Oskar Staufer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of extracellular vesicles, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Novel Reporter Mouse for Astrocyte-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Reveals Enrichment of Cargo at Neuronal Mitochondria.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rethinking Extracellular Vesicle Signaling.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kevin JahnkeSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Oskar StauferINM - Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8015-3132
Harvard University · USUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung Feodor Lynen FellowshipDaimler und Benz Stiftung 285523Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 525255627Joachim Herz Stiftung Add-on fellowships
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), lipid-enclosed structures released by virtually all life forms, have gained significant attention due to their role in intercellular and interorganismal communication. Despite their recognized importance in disease processes and therapeutic applications, fundamental questions about their primary function remain. Here, we propose a different perspective on the primary function of EVs, arguing that they serve as essential elements providing membrane area for long-distance, contact-dependent cellular communication based on protein-protein interaction. While EVs have been recognized as carriers of genetic information, additional unique advantages that they could provide for cellular communication remain unclear. Here, we introduce the concept that the substantial membrane area provided by EVs allows for membrane contact-dependent interactions that could be central to their function. This membrane area enables the lateral diffusion and sorting of membrane ligands like proteins, polysaccharides or lipids in two dimensions, promoting avidity-driven effects and assembly of co-stimulatory architectures at the EV-cell interface. The concept of vesicle-induced receptor sequestration (VIRS), for example, describes how EVs confine and focus receptors at the EV contact site, promoting a dense local concentration of receptors into signalosomes. This process can increase the signalling strength of EV-presented ligands by 10-1000-fold compared to their soluble counterparts. The speculations in this perspective advance our understanding of EV-biology and have critical implications for EV-based applications and therapeutics. We suggest a shift in perspective from viewing EVs merely as transporters of relevant nucleic acids and proteins to considering their unique biophysical properties as presentation platforms for long-distance, contact-dependent signalling. We therefore highlight the functional role of the EV membrane rather than their content. We further discuss how this signalling mechanism might be exploited by virus-transformed or cancer cells to enhance immune-evasive mechanisms.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationExtracellular VesiclesSignal TransductionAnimalsCell MembraneHumanscontact‐dependent signallingextracellular vesiclesimmunotherapymembrane biologysignalosomes

Identifiers

PMID38649339
PMCPMC11035383
OpenAlexW4395046818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.