Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38649278›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Locus Ceruleus Dynamics Are Suppressed during Licking and Enhanced Postlicking Independent of Taste Novelty.

Will Fan, Christopher B Engborg, Natale R Sciolino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Will FanDepartments of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269.
Christopher B EngborgDepartments of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269.
Natale R SciolinoDepartments of Physiology and Neurobiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269 natale.sciolino@uconn.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-1989

Funding

Defining locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) circuits in feedingR00DK119586 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI SCIOLINO, NATALE R · 2021 to 2023
$730k
NIDDK NIH HHS R00 DK119586
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attending to salient sensory attributes of food, such as tastes that are new, displeasing, or unexpected, allows the procurement of nutrients without food poisoning. Exposure to new tastes is known to increase norepinephrine (NE) release in taste processing forebrain areas, yet the central source for this release is unknown. Locus ceruleus norepinephrine neurons (LC-NE) emerge as a candidate in signaling salient information about taste, as other salient sensory stimuli (e.g., visual, auditory, somatosensation) are known to activate LC neurons. To determine if LC neurons are sensitive to features of taste novelty, we used fiber photometry to record LC-NE activity in water-restricted mice that voluntarily licked either novel or familiar substances of differential palatability (saccharine, citric acid). We observed that LC-NE activity was suppressed during lick bursts and transiently activated upon the termination of licking and that these dynamics were independent of the familiarity of the substance consumed. We next recorded LC dynamics during brief and unexpected consumption of tastants and found no increase in LC-NE activity, despite their responsiveness to visual and auditory stimuli, revealing selectivity in LC's responses to salient sensory information. Our findings suggest that LC activity during licking is not influenced by taste novelty, implicating a possible role for non-LC noradrenergic nuclei in signaling critical information about taste.

Indexed as

Locus CoeruleusMice, Inbred C57BLNorepinephrineTasteAnimalsBehavior, AnimalCitric AcidFemaleMaleMiceNeuronsSaccharinTaste PerceptionCitric AcidNorepinephrineSaccharinfiber photometrylickinglocus ceruleusnorepinephrinenoveltytaste

Identifiers

PMID38649278
PMCPMC11036117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.