Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38648778›Full record

Observational studyRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Risk of chronic kidney disease in 260 patients with lupus nephritis: analysis of a nationwide multicentre cohort with up to 35 years of follow-up.

Filipa Farinha, Sofia Barreira, Maura Couto, Margarida Cunha, Diogo Fonseca, Raquel Freitas, Luís Inês, Mariana Luís, Carla Macieira, Ana R Prata and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Not So Benign: Revisiting Pure Membranous Lupus Nephritis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Filipa FarinhaCentre for Rheumatology, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-4383
Sofia BarreiraServiço de Reumatologia e Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maura CoutoRheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Margarida CunhaRheumatology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Diogo FonsecaRheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Raquel FreitasRheumatology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Luís InêsRheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3172-3570
Mariana LuísRheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9581-7088
Carla MacieiraServiço de Reumatologia e Doenças Ósseas Metabólicas, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana R PrataRheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-2216
Joana RodriguesServiço de Reumatologia, Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Ponte de Lima, Portugal.
Bernardo SantosRheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, EPE, Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Rita TorresServiço de Reumatologia, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental-Hospital Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ruth J PepperCentre for Nephrology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anisur RahmanCentre for Rheumatology, University College of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2346-4484
Maria J SantosRheumatology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7946-1365
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTBritish Society for Rheumatology · GBCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTHospital Garcia de Orta · PTAdministração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo · PTCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia · PTCentro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga · PTCentro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu · PTHospital de Egas Moniz · PTLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/2020.07131.BDLUPUS UK 1543411National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare proliferative (PLN) and membranous (MLN) lupus nephritis (LN) regarding clinical and laboratory presentation and long-term outcomes, and to investigate predictors of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD).

methodsMulticentre observational study, with retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort, using data from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Registry - Reuma.pt. Patients with biopsy-proven PLN, MLN and mixed LN were included. Cox regression survival analysis was used to investigate predictors of CKD.

resultsA total of 260 patients were included. Median follow-up was 8 years (IQR 11; minimum 1, maximum 35 years). MLN patients presented with significantly lower serum creatinine [0.70 (IQR 0.20; minimum 0.50, maximum 1.30) mg/dl vs 0.80 (IQR 0.31; minimum 0.26, maximum 2.60) in PLN, P = 0.003]. Proteinuria levels did not differ between groups (P = 0.641). Levels of complement were reduced in PLN but nearly normal in MLN patients, and there were fewer patients with positive anti-dsDNA antibodies in the MLN group (P < 0.001). One year after the beginning of treatment, 62% of the patients achieved EULAR/ERA-EDTA complete response, with a further 5% achieving partial response. Patients with lower proteinuria at diagnosis were more likely to achieve a complete renal response at one year; however, proteinuria at diagnosis or at one year did not predict long-term CKD. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤75 mL/min/1.73 m2 at one year was the strongest predictor of progression to CKD (HR 23 [95% CI 8-62], P < 0.001). Other possible predictors included the use of azathioprine for induction of remission, older age at diagnosis and male sex.

conclusionProteinuria levels did not predict LN histologic class in our cohort. eGFR cutoff of 75 mL/min/1.73 m2 after one year of treatment was strongly predictive of progression to CKD.

Indexed as

Lupus NephritisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultCreatinineDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateGlomerulonephritis, MembranousHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPortugalProteinuriaRegistriesCreatinineImmunosuppressive Agentschronic kidney diseasemembranous lupus nephritisproliferative lupus nephritissurvival analysissystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID38648778
PMCPMC11879298
OpenAlexW4394992326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.