Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38648563›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Use of Sodium Thiosulfate as an Otoprotectant in Patients With Cancer Treated With Platinum Compounds: A Review of the Literature.

Annelot J M Meijer, Franciscus A Diepstraten, Marc Ansari, Eric Bouffet, Archie Bleyer, Brice Fresneau, James I Geller, Alwin D R Huitema, Per Kogner, Rudolf Maibach and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Neural Hearing Loss: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment Horizons.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Military Medical Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Approaches to Reduce Toxicity in Pediatric Brain Tumors.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 14 institutions in 9 countries.

Annelot J M MeijerPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1631-0006
Franciscus A DiepstratenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2507-1820
Marc AnsariCansearch Research Platform for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Geneva, Division of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Department of Women, Child and Adolescent, University Geneva Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eric BouffetDivision of Pediatric Neuro-Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6832-6539
Archie BleyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-5146
Brice FresneauDepartment of Children and Adolescents Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University Paris Saclay and Radiation Epidemiology Team, CESO, Inserm U1018, Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7603-7828
James I GellerDivision of Oncology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
Alwin D R HuitemaPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Per KognerDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Childhood Cancer Research Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2202-9694
Rudolf MaibachETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation, Bern, Switzerland.
Allison F O'NeillDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-8957-3870
Vassilios PapadakisDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology (TAO), Agia Sofia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-1821-7799
Kaukab M RajputDepartment of Pediatric Audiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gareth J VealNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1897-8678
Michael SullivanChildren's Cancer Centre and Department of Pediatric Oncology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8606-5889
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Penelope R BrockDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1239-6316
Princess Máxima Center · NLGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GBCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · USHospital for Sick Children · CAIaso Children’s Hospital · GRInserm · FRInternational Breast Cancer Study Group · CHKarolinska Institutet · SENewcastle University · GBOregon Health & Science University · USRoyal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Geneva · CHUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHearing loss occurs in 50%-70% of children treated with cisplatin. Scientific efforts have led to the recent approval of a pediatric formula of intravenous sodium thiosulfate (STS) for otoprotection by the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and the Medicines and Health Regulatory Authority in the United Kingdom. To inform stakeholders regarding the clinical utility of STS, the current review summarizes available literature on the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of systemic STS to minimize cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL).

designA comprehensive narrative review is presented.

resultsThirty-one articles were summarized. Overall, systemic STS effectively reduces CIHL in the preclinical and controlled clinical study settings, in both adults and children with cancer. The extent of CIHL reduction depends on the timing and dosing of STS in relation to cisplatin. Both preclinical and clinical data suggest that systemic STS may affect plasma platinum levels, but studies are inconclusive. Delayed systemic administration of STS, at 6 hours after the cisplatin infusion, does not affect cisplatin-induced inhibition of tumor growth or cellular cytotoxicity in the preclinical setting, nor affect cisplatin efficacy and survival in children with localized disease in the clinical setting.

conclusionSystemic administration of STS effectively reduces the development and degree of CIHL in both the preclinical and clinical settings. More studies are needed on the PK of STS and cisplatin drug combinations, the efficacy and safety of STS in patients with disseminated disease, and the ability of STS to prevent further deterioration of pre-established hearing loss.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCisplatinHearing LossNeoplasmsThiosulfatesChildHumansAntineoplastic AgentsCisplatinsodium thiosulfateThiosulfates

Identifiers

PMID38648563
PMCPMC11191063
OpenAlexW4394993360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.