Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38648203›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024

Unveiling the Temporal Aspect of MRI Tattoo Reactions: A Prospective Evaluation of a Newly-Acquired Tattoo with Multiple MRI Scans.

Kasper Køhler Alsing, Helle Hjorth Johannesen, Nina Løth Mårtensson, Paul Joseph Kempen, Marie Karen Tracy Hong Lin, Klaus Qvortrup, Rasmus Hvass Hansen

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [MRI safety : Principles, risks and protective measures].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kasper Køhler AlsingDepartment of Dermatology & Copenhagen Wound Healing Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copgenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1706-6383
Helle Hjorth JohannesenDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9172-5004
Nina Løth MårtenssonDepartment of Pathology, Diagnostic Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul Joseph KempenNational Centre for Nano Fabrication and Characterization, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2179-2257
Marie Karen Tracy Hong LinNational Centre for Nano Fabrication and Characterization, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5911-9941
Klaus QvortrupCore Facility for Integrated Microscopy (CFIM), Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-0260
Rasmus Hvass HansenSection for Radiation Therapy, Department of Oncology, Center for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8310-7692
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKTechnical University of Denmark · DKBispebjerg Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Over the past 30 years, painful reactions during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in tattooed individuals have been sporadically reported. These complications manifest as burning pain in tattooed skin areas, occasionally with swelling and redness, often leading to termination of the scanning. The exact cause is unclear, but iron oxide pigments in permanent make-up or elements in carbon black tattoos may play a role. Additionally, factors like tattoo age, design, and color may influence reactions. The existing literature lacks comprehensive evidence, leaving many questions unanswered. CASE REPORT We present the unique case of a young man who experienced recurring painful reactions in a recently applied black tattoo during multiple MRI scans. Despite the absence of ferrimagnetic ingredients in the tattoo ink, the patient reported intense burning sensations along with transient erythema and edema. Interestingly, the severity of these reactions gradually decreased over time, suggesting a time-dependent factor contributing to the problem. This finding highlights the potential influence of pigment particle density in the skin on the severity and risk of MRI interactions. We hypothesize that the painful sensations could be triggered by excitation of dermal C-fibers by conductive elements in the tattoo ink, likely carbon particles. CONCLUSIONS Our case study highlights that MRI-induced tattoo reactions may gradually decrease over time. While MRI scans occasionally can cause transient reactions in tattoos, they do not result in permanent skin damage and remain a safe and essential diagnostic tool. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind these reactions and explore preventive measures.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingTattooingAdultHumansInkMaleProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38648203
PMCPMC11056212
OpenAlexW4392749848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.