Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38648092›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2024

Stimulating Preconception Care Uptake by Women With a Vulnerable Health Status Through a Mobile Health App (Pregnant Faster): Pilot Feasibility Study.

Sharissa M Smith, Babette Bais, Hafez Ismaili M'hamdi, Maartje Hn Schermer, Régine Pm Steegers-Theunissen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sharissa M SmithDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5085-4755
Babette BaisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-6670
Hafez Ismaili M'hamdiDepartment of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5559-2694
Maartje Hn SchermerDepartment of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4283-9659
Régine Pm Steegers-TheunissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-5756
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA low socioeconomic status is associated with a vulnerable health status (VHS) through the accumulation of health-related risk factors, such as poor lifestyle behaviors (eg, inadequate nutrition, chronic stress, and impaired health literacy). For pregnant women, a VHS translates into a high incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and therefore pregnancy-related inequity. We hypothesize that stimulating adequate pregnancy preparation, targeting lifestyle behaviors and preconception care (PCC) uptake, can reduce these inequities and improve the pregnancy outcomes of women with a VHS. A nudge is a behavioral intervention aimed at making healthy choices easier and more attractive and may therefore be a feasible way to stimulate engagement in pregnancy preparation and PCC uptake, especially in women with a VHS. To support adequate pregnancy preparation, we designed a mobile health (mHealth) app, Pregnant Faster, that fits the preferences of women with a VHS and uses nudging to encourage PCC consultation visits and engagement in education on healthy lifestyle behaviors.

objectiveThis study aimed to test the feasibility of Pregnant Faster by determining usability and user satisfaction, the number of visited PCC consultations, and the course of practical study conduction.

methodsWomen aged 18-45 years, with low-to-intermediate educational attainment, who were trying to become pregnant within 12 months were included in this open cohort. Recruitment took place through social media, health care professionals, and distribution of flyers and posters from September 2021 until June 2022. Participants used Pregnant Faster daily for 4 weeks, earning coins by reading blogs on pregnancy preparation, filling out a daily questionnaire on healthy lifestyle choices, and registering for a PCC consultation with a midwife. Earned coins could be spent on rewards, such as fruit, mascara, and baby products. Evaluation took place through the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ), an additional interview or questionnaire, and assessment of overall study conduction.

resultsDue to limited inclusions, the inclusion criterion "living in a deprived neighborhood" was dropped. This resulted in the inclusion of 47 women, of whom 39 (83%) completed the intervention. In total, 16 (41%) of 39 participants visited a PCC consultation, with their main motivation being obtaining personalized information. The majority of participants agreed with 16 (88.9%) of 18 statements of the MAUQ, indicating high user satisfaction. The mean rating was 7.7 (SD 1.0) out of 10. Points of improvement included recruitment of the target group, simplification of the log-in system, and automation of manual tasks.

conclusionsNudging women through Pregnant Faster to stimulate pregnancy preparation and PCC uptake has proven feasible, but the inclusion criteria must be revised. A substantial number of PCC consultations were conducted, and this study will therefore be continued with an open cohort of 400 women, aiming to establish the (cost-)effectiveness of an updated version, named Pregnant Faster 2. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/45293.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPreconception CareAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPregnancyVulnerable PopulationsYoung Adultappapplicationchronic stresshealth inequalityhealth literacylifestylemHealthmHealth appmHealth applicationmobile healthnudgenutritionpilot feasibility studypreconception carepregnancypregnancy preparationpregnantpregnant womenrisk factorsocioeconomicsocioeconomic statusstressusabilityuserusersuser satisfactionwomen

Identifiers

PMID38648092
PMCPMC11074886
OpenAlexW4394999573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.