ArticleFood and environmental virology2024
Comparison of Three Viral Nucleic Acid Preamplification Pipelines for Sewage Viral Metagenomics.
Article in Food and environmental virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Viral metagenomics is a useful tool for detecting multiple human viruses in urban sewage. However, more refined protocols are required for its effective use in disease surveillance. In this study, we investigated the performance of three different preamplification pipelines (specific to RNA viruses, DNA viruses or both) for viral genome sequencing using spiked-in Phosphate Buffered Saline and sewage samples containing known concentrations of viruses. We found that compared to the pipeline targeting all genome types, the RNA pipeline performed better in detecting RNA viruses in both spiked and unspiked sewage samples, allowing the detection of various mammalian viruses including members from the Reoviridae, Picornaviridae, Astroviridae and Caliciviridae. However, the DNA-specific pipeline did not improve the detection of mammalian DNA viruses. We also measured viral recovery by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and assessed the impact of genetic background (non-viral genetic material) on viral coverage. Our results indicate that viral recoveries were generally lower in sewage (average of 11.0%) and higher in Phosphate Buffered Saline (average of 23.4%) for most viruses. Additionally, spiked-in viruses showed lower genome coverage in sewage, demonstrating the negative effect of genetic background on sequencing. Finally, correlation analysis revealed a relationship between virus concentration and genome normalized reads per million, indicating that viral metagenomic sequencing can be semiquantitative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.