Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38647844›Full record

ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2022

Impact of sheep wool residues as soil amendments on olive beneficial symbionts and bacterial diversity.

Michela Palla, Alessandra Turrini, Caterina Cristani, Laura Bonora, David Pellegrini, Jacopo Primicerio, Arianna Grassi, Filip Hilaj, Manuela Giovannetti, Monica Agnolucci

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michela Palla *Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandra Turrini *Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Caterina CristaniDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Laura BonoraNational Research Council-Institute of BioEconomy (CNR-IBE), via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.
David PellegriniNational Research Council-Institute of BioEconomy (CNR-IBE), via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.
Jacopo PrimicerioNational Research Council-Institute of BioEconomy (CNR-IBE), via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy.
Arianna GrassiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Filip HilajDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Manuela GiovannettiDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy.
Monica AgnolucciDepartment of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, 56124, Pisa, Italy. monica.agnolucci@unipi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-3872
University of Pisa · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

Università di Pisa Fondi di Ateneo
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years the use of organic matter soil amendments, such as agricultural by-products, has been implemented with the aim of increasing soil fertility, while minimizing the environmental impact of agriculture. Sheep wool residues (SWR) have shown beneficial effects on plant nutrition and soil properties, while only few works assessed their impact on soil microbial communities. The main aim of this work was to investigate the possible valorization of two SWR types (scoured residues, white wool, WW, and carbonized scoured residues, black wool, BW) as organic soil amendments, in pot-grown olive trees, by evaluating their impact on soil bacterial communities and mycorrhizal symbionts. The two SWR types did not negatively impact on the diversity and composition of soil bacterial communities, as revealed by PCR-denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) of partial 16S rRNA gene, and on the activity of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), while positively affecting plant growth. Only the highest doses of one SWR type (2% BW) caused a decrease in bacterial diversity and native AMF ability to colonize olive roots. DGGE bands sequencing allowed the identification of the major bacterial taxa. Sequences corresponding to Ohtaekwangia spp., Beta proteobacterium, Blastocatella sp., Ramlibacter monticola and Massilia frigida/rubra, Dongia sp. and Chloroflexi were mainly represented in SWR-amended soils, while those represented by Chryseolinea soli and Acidobacteria were abundant in control soil. Overall, this work showed that SWR may be valorized as organic soil amendments, as soil bacteria and AMF, representing key factors of biological soil fertility, were not negatively affected, while the activity of bacterial genera and species known for their ability to decompose complex compounds was boosted. Further studies will investigate the biodegradation efficiency of the diverse bacterial taxa developing in SWR-amended soils.

Indexed as

Agro-industrial residues valorizationArbuscular mycorrhizal symbiontsMycorrhizal inoculum potential (MIP) bioassayPCR-denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE)Soil bacterial communities

Identifiers

PMID38647844
PMCPMC10992544
OpenAlexW4224302143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.