Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38647661›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2024

Machine learning applications in craniosynostosis diagnosis and treatment prediction: a systematic review.

Angela Luo, Muhammet Enes Gurses, Neslihan Nisa Gecici, Giovanni Kozel, Victor M Lu, Ricardo J Komotar, Michael E Ivan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Quantifying Sagittal Craniosynostosis Severity: A Machine Learning Approach With CranioRate.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela LuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Muhammet Enes GursesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA. megursesmd@gmail.com.
Neslihan Nisa GeciciHacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Giovanni KozelWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Victor M LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Ricardo J KomotarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
Michael E IvanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1475 NW 12th Ave, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniosynostosis refers to the premature fusion of one or more of the fibrous cranial sutures connecting the bones of the skull. Machine learning (ML) is an emerging technology and its application to craniosynostosis detection and management is underexplored. This systematic review aims to evaluate the application of ML techniques in the diagnosis, severity assessment, and predictive modeling of craniosynostosis. A comprehensive search was conducted on the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using predefined keywords related to craniosynostosis and ML. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies in English that investigated ML algorithms in craniosynostosis diagnosis, severity assessment, or treatment outcome prediction. Three independent reviewers screened the search results, performed full-text assessments, and extracted data from selected studies using a standardized form. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Of the thirteen papers examined on the application of ML to the identification and treatment of craniosynostosis, two papers were dedicated to sagittal craniosynostosis, five papers utilized several different types of craniosynostosis in the training and testing of their ML models, and six papers were dedicated to metopic craniosynostosis. ML models demonstrated high accuracy in identifying different types of craniosynostosis and objectively quantifying severity using innovative metrics such as metopic severity score and cranial morphology deviation. The findings highlight the significant strides made in utilizing ML techniques for craniosynostosis diagnosis, severity assessment, and predictive modeling. Predictive modeling of treatment outcomes following surgical interventions showed promising results, aiding in personalized treatment strategies. Despite methodological diversities among studies, the collective evidence underscores ML's transformative potential in revolutionizing craniosynostosis management.

Indexed as

CraniosynostosesMachine LearningHumansCraniosynostosisDiagnostic modelsMachine learningPediatric neurosurgeryTreatment outcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID38647661
PMCPMC11269440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.