Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38647650›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2024

Non-adherence to cardiometabolic medication as assessed by LC-MS/MS in urine and its association with kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sara Denicolò, Vera Reinstadler, Felix Keller, Stefanie Thöni, Susanne Eder, Hiddo J L Heerspink, László Rosivall, Andrzej Wiecek, Patrick B Mark, Paul Perco and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Fixed-Dose Combination Therapy as a Strategy to Improve Antidiabetic Medication Adherence in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Sara DenicolòDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. sara.denicolo@i-med.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1558-6134
Vera ReinstadlerInstitute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3706-2910
Felix KellerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-7255
Stefanie ThöniDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Susanne EderDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Hiddo J L HeerspinkDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-3730
László RosivallInternational Nephrology Research and Training Center, Institute of Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9809-3879
Andrzej WiecekDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-4188
Patrick B MarkSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-2123
Paul PercoDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-5691
Johannes LeiererDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7884-9827
Andreas KronbichlerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2945-2946
Herbert OberacherInstitute of Legal Medicine and Core Facility Metabolomics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0963-8268
Gert MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-1789
Innsbruck Medical University · ATMedical University of Silesia · PLSemmelweis University · HUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

European Union No. 241544 (Systems Biology towards Novel ChronicHorizon 2020 No 848011 (DC-ren)Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking No 115974 (BEAt-DKD)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisNon-adherence to medication is a frequent barrier in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, potentially limiting the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments. Previous studies have mostly relied on indirect adherence measures to analyse outcomes based on adherence. The aim of this study was to use LC-MS/MS in urine-a non-invasive, direct and objective measure-to assess non-adherence to cardiometabolic drugs and analyse its association with kidney and cardiovascular outcomes.

methodsThis cohort study includes 1125 participants from the PROVALID study, which follows patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at the primary care level. Baseline urine samples were tested for 79 cardiometabolic drugs and metabolites thereof via LC-MS/MS. An individual was classified as totally adherent if markers for all drugs were detected, partially non-adherent when at least one marker for one drug was detected, and totally non-adherent if no markers for any drugs were detected. Non-adherence was then analysed in the context of cardiovascular (composite of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death) and kidney (composite of sustained 40% decline in eGFR, sustained progression of albuminuria, kidney replacement therapy and death from kidney failure) outcomes.

resultsOf the participants, 56.3% were totally adherent, 42.0% were partially non-adherent, and 1.7% were totally non-adherent to screened cardiometabolic drugs. Adherence was highest to antiplatelet and glucose-lowering agents and lowest to lipid-lowering agents. Over a median (IQR) follow-up time of 5.10 (4.12-6.12) years, worse cardiovascular outcomes were observed with non-adherence to antiplatelet drugs (HR 10.13 [95% CI 3.06, 33.56]) and worse kidney outcomes were observed with non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs (HR 1.98 [95% CI 1.37, 2.86]). CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThis analysis shows that non-adherence to cardiometabolic drug regimens is common in type 2 diabetes mellitus and negatively affects kidney and cardiovascular outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Medication AdherenceTandem Mass SpectrometryAgedCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesChromatography, LiquidCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsKidneyLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMaleMiddle AgedCardiovascular AgentsHypoglycemic AgentsAdherenceCardiovascular diseaseDiabetic kidney diseaseType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID38647650
PMCPMC11153278
OpenAlexW4395005925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.