ArticleNucleic acids research2024
Comprehensive genomic features indicative for Notch responsiveness.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Synergistic Crosstalk of PACAP and Notch Signaling Pathways in Bone Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factor RBPJ is the central component in Notch signal transduction and directly forms a coactivator complex together with the Notch intracellular domain (NICD). While RBPJ protein levels remain constant in most tissues, dynamic expression of Notch target genes varies depending on the given cell-type and the Notch activity state. To elucidate dynamic RBPJ binding genome-wide, we investigated RBPJ occupancy by ChIP-Seq. Surprisingly, only a small set of the total RBPJ sites show a dynamic binding behavior in response to Notch signaling. Compared to static RBPJ sites, dynamic sites differ in regard to their chromatin state, binding strength and enhancer positioning. Dynamic RBPJ sites are predominantly located distal to transcriptional start sites (TSSs), while most static sites are found in promoter-proximal regions. Importantly, gene responsiveness is preferentially associated with dynamic RBPJ binding sites and this static and dynamic binding behavior is repeatedly observed across different cell types and species. Based on the above findings we used a machine-learning algorithm to predict Notch responsiveness with high confidence in different cellular contexts. Our results strongly support the notion that the combination of binding strength and enhancer positioning are indicative of Notch responsiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.