Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646999›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2024

Single proxy control.

Chan Park, David B Richardson, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chan ParkDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8315-1522
David B RichardsonDepartment of Environmental & Occupational Health, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-0212
Eric J Tchetgen TchetgenDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Funding

Next Generation Missing Data Methods in HIV ResearchR01AI127271 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Low-Dose Exposure to Ionizing Radiation in Adulthood and Subsequent CancerR01CA242852 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID B RICHARDSON · 2019 to 2026
$1.8M
Accounting for Hidden Bias in Vaccine Studies: A Negative Control FrameworkR01GM139926 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHI, XU, TCHETGEN TCHETGEN, ERIC JOEL · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: Models for Policy MakingR01OH011409 · OH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RICHARDSON, DAVID B · 2017 to 2021
$814k
ACL HHS R01OH011409NCI NIH HHS R01 CA242852NCI NIH HHS R01CA242852NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM139926NIH HHS R01AI127271NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011409NIOSH CDC HHS R01OH011409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative control variables are sometimes used in nonexperimental studies to detect the presence of confounding by hidden factors. A negative control outcome (NCO) is an outcome that is influenced by unobserved confounders of the exposure effects on the outcome in view, but is not causally impacted by the exposure. Tchetgen Tchetgen (2013) introduced the Control Outcome Calibration Approach (COCA) as a formal NCO counterfactual method to detect and correct for residual confounding bias. For identification, COCA treats the NCO as an error-prone proxy of the treatment-free counterfactual outcome of interest, and involves regressing the NCO on the treatment-free counterfactual, together with a rank-preserving structural model, which assumes a constant individual-level causal effect. In this work, we establish nonparametric COCA identification for the average causal effect for the treated, without requiring rank-preservation, therefore accommodating unrestricted effect heterogeneity across units. This nonparametric identification result has important practical implications, as it provides single-proxy confounding control, in contrast to recently proposed proximal causal inference, which relies for identification on a pair of confounding proxies. For COCA estimation we propose 3 separate strategies: (i) an extended propensity score approach, (ii) an outcome bridge function approach, and (iii) a doubly-robust approach. Finally, we illustrate the proposed methods in an application evaluating the causal impact of a Zika virus outbreak on birth rate in Brazil.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreBiasBrazilCausalityComputer SimulationConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleHumansModels, StatisticalPregnancyZika Virus Infectionconfounding proxydoubly robustextended propensity scorenegative controlsunmeasured confounding

Identifiers

PMID38646999
PMCPMC11033710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.