ArticleCurrent protocols2024
Optimized Workflow for Proteomics and Phosphoproteomics With Limited Tissue Samples.
Article in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteomics and phosphoproteomics play crucial roles in elucidating the dynamics of post-transcriptional processes. While experimental methods and workflows have been established in this field, a persistent challenge arises when dealing with small samples containing a limited amount of protein. This limitation can significantly impact the recovery of peptides and phosphopeptides. In response to this challenge, we have developed a comprehensive experimental workflow tailored specifically for small-scale samples, with a special emphasis on neuronal tissues like the trigeminal ganglion. Our proposed workflow consists of seven steps aimed at optimizing the preparation of limited tissue samples for both proteomic and phosphoproteomic analyses. One noteworthy innovation in our approach involves the utilization of a dual enrichment strategy for phosphopeptides. Initially, we employ Fe-NTA Magnetic beads, renowned for their specificity and effectiveness in capturing phosphopeptides. Subsequently, we complement this approach with the TiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.