ArticleOncology letters2024
Rare retroperitoneal giant sacral schwannoma: A case report.
Article in Oncology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Presentation and surgical management approaches of giant presacral and sacral schwannomas: a case report and systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Pooled it
- Pelvic schwannoma misdiagnosed as colorectal cancer metastasis and the corresponding diagnostic lessons: A report of two cases.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- A case report of retroperitoneal schwannoma with malignant transformation and unusual size.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- A case of retroperitoneal malignant schwannoma in a young male: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- A giant presacral schwannoma - Surgical considerations with an illustrative case and review of the literature.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- A Rare Case of a Gigantic Retroperitoneal Schwannoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schwannomas localized in the sacrum are relatively infrequent, accounting for 1-5% of all spinal axis schwannomas; they present with vague symptoms or are symptomless, so often grow to a considerable size before detection. Sacral schwannomas occasionally present with enormous dimensions, and these tumors are termed giant sacral schwannomas. However, their surgical removal is challenging owing to an abundant vascularity. The present study retrospectively analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of a patient with a giant sacral schwannoma. The patient experienced numbness in the left buttock and lower extremity, with radiating pain in the sole of the foot that had persisted for 3 years. A presacral mass was found by computed tomography examination 6 months after the stool had become thin. A tumor resection was performed using the anterior abdominal approach. A schwannoma was diagnosed by postoperative pathology. The postoperative course was uneventful, with the complete resolution of symptoms during the 21-month clinical follow-up. Overall, the present study reports the case of a giant sacral schwannoma with pelvic pain that was resected without complications and also discusses its successful management. Additionally, the study presents a systematic review of the literature. We consider that the surgical treatment of giant sacral schwannomas with piecemeal subtotal excision can achieve good outcomes, avoiding unnecessary neurological deficits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.