Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646465›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024

All-inside posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A systematic review of current practice.

Jun Rui Don Koh, Sir Young James Loh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jun Rui Don KohChangi General Hospital, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore, 529889.
Sir Young James LohChangi General Hospital, 2 Simei St 3, Singapore, 529889.
Changi General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The All-Inside PCL Reconstruction is a surgical technique which overcomes some of the key challenges faced with traditional PCL Reconstruction, and is becoming more relevant as the rate of PCL reconstruction increases.The purpose of this study is to review the technical practices of the all-inside PCL reconstruction since it was first introduced, with respect to the various key components involved in the surgical technique, to provide more information to the surgeon of the various surgical options available in practice. Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed by the authors in January 2023 as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify all studies outlining the all-inside surgical technique in the past decade. The predetermined eligibility criteria were applied in the screening of the literature in Pubmed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases. Results: A total of 14 studies were included in the final review, 9 technical studies, 2 case series, 2 book chapters and 1 review. An allograft was the preferred choice in 9 of the 14 studies. The semitendinosus was preferred when an autograft was chosen. Quadruple folding of the graft was the preferred configuration in 11 studies with the graft diameters from 8 to 12 mm and length ranging from 60 to 150 mm. The femur socket length ranged from 15 to 35 mm and the tibia socket length ranged from 20 to 70 mm. All the studies reported the use of at least 3 portals and up to 6 portals was also reported. 13 studies reported the graft docking first into tibia socket followed by the femoral socket. 7 studies reported the graft entry via the AM portal and 6 studies used a lateral portal. 9 studies used augmentation such as suture anchors (6 studies) and suture tape (3 studies). The 30° and 70° arthroscopic lenses were used alternatingly in 8 studies and fluoroscopy was utilized in 10 studies. Conclusion: The current literature review of all-inside PCL reconstruction consisted mainly technical studies and more clinical outcomes studies are needed to determine its efficacy. It observed a trend to use an allograft, at least 3 portals and docking the graft in the tibia socket first. There is no obvious preference of portal for graft entry.

Identifiers

PMID38646465
PMCPMC11026532
OpenAlexW4394585254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.