Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38646375›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Appearance and Prevalence of JN.1 SARS-CoV-2 Variant in India and Its Clinical Profile in the State of Maharashtra.

Rajesh P Karyakarte, Rashmita Das, Mansi V Rajmane, Sonali Dudhate, Jeanne Agarasen, Praveena Pillai, Priyanka M Chandankhede, Rutika S Labhshetwar, Yogita Gadiyal, Preeti P Kulkarni and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Wastewater Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in Zambia: An Early Warning Tool.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rajesh P KaryakarteMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Rashmita DasMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Mansi V RajmaneMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Sonali DudhateMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Jeanne AgarasenMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Praveena PillaiMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Priyanka M ChandankhedeMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Rutika S LabhshetwarMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Yogita GadiyalMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Preeti P KulkarniMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Safanah NizarudeenMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Sushma YanamandraMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Nyabom TajiMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Suvarna JoshiMicrobiology, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Government Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, IND.
Varsha PotdarInfectious Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Virology, Pune, IND.
B. J. Medical College & Sassoon Hospital · INICMR-National Institute of Virology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn August 2023, the BA.2.86 SARS-CoV-2 variant, with over 30 spike protein mutations, emerged amidst the global dominance of XBB sub-lineages. It evolved into JN.1 by late 2023, spreading across 71 countries. JN.1, distinct for its L455S mutation, significantly dominated global sequences, raising concerns over its transmission and clinical impact. The study investigates JN.1's clinical severity and its effect on hospital admissions in Maharashtra, India. METHODOLOGY: The present study involved 3,150 curated Indian SARS-CoV-2 whole genome sequences with collection dates between 1st August 2023 and 15th January 2024. Lineage and phylogenetic analysis of sequences was performed using Nextclade. Telephonic interviews were conducted to confirm the demographic details and obtain clinical information on the JN.1* (* indicates JN.1 and all its sub-lineages) cases. The obtained data were recorded and analyzed using Microsoft® Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA).

resultsOut of 3,150 sequences analyzed, JN.1* was the most common lineage (2377/3150, 75.46%), followed by XBB.2.3* (281/3150, 8.92%) and XBB.1.16* (187/3150, 5.94%). In India, it was first identified on 6th October 2023, in Kerala. The highest proportion of JN.1* sequences originated from Maharashtra (628/2377, 26.42%), followed by West Bengal (320/2377, 13.46%), Andhra Pradesh (293/2377, 12.33%), Kerala (288/2377, 12.12%), and Karnataka (285/2377, 11.99%). In Maharashtra, the JN.1* variant was first identified on 23rd November 2023. A total of 279 JN.1* cases were included in the clinical study. Of these, 95.34% (266/279) had symptomatic disease with mild symptoms; cold (187/279, 67.03%) being the most common symptom, followed by fever (156/279, 55.91%), cough (114/279, 40.86%), and headache (28/279, 15.64%). Of all the cases, 13.26% (37/279) required institutional quarantine or hospitalization, and the rest were isolated at home. Among the hospitalized patients, 54.05% (20/37) cases were given conservative treatment while 45.95% (17/37) cases required supplemental oxygen therapy. Regarding the vaccination status, 94.26% (263/279) of cases received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, while 5.02% (14/279) were not vaccinated, of which most were children aged zero to nine years (5/14, 35.71%). The overall recovery rate among JN.1* cases was 98.57% (275/279), with 1.43% (4/279) cases succumbing to the disease.

conclusionThe JN.1* variant, the dominant variant in India, exhibits clinical features similar to previous circulating variants in Maharashtra without increased severity. Its notable transmissibility underscores the importance of studying the ongoing viral evolution. The pressing necessity for swift identification and the clinical features of new variants is essential for effective public health response.

Indexed as

ba.2.86ba.2.86.1.1clinical characteristicscovid-19covid-19 diseasejn.1pirolasars-cov-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID38646375
PMCPMC11032724
OpenAlexW4393080840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.